I see, it does look like they are in the cortex in 3D view. Although I tried to keep them in white matter in 2D planes as possible. I will try deleting some. Thank you, Manorama ________________________________ From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Douglas N. Greve <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2021 5:41 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Using control points for intensity normalization
Generally, control points are the way to go here. It looks like you have put a bunch of them in cortex though On 5/21/2021 12:14 PM, Kadwani, Manorama wrote: Hi, I am trying to correct the white matter segmentation in the second image shown below. It doesn't include chunks of the temporal lobe with low intensity on both hemispheres. [cid:part1.CCDF94B1.7201CC50@mgh.harvard.edu][cid:part2.FC9BA22F.8EE5EBBF@mgh.harvard.edu] I placed many control points on every slice in the brainmask.mgz file. Then I re-ran recon-all using -autorecon2-cp argument. But the white matter volume did not grow into those regions with control points. The process completed without any errors. [cid:part3.8EBAACCD.C13C0D60@mgh.harvard.edu] Any idea on how I can include those regions in white matter? I also tried to use 'mri_segment' for lowering the white matter low limit to 60. That did include some parts of the missing lobes, but also included grey matter from frontal and parietal lobes. So, that approach was not ideal. Thank you, Manorama _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham Compliance HelpLine at http://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted). If you do not wish to continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of this message immediately. Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail.
