Hi Antonin

Sorry for the trouble. We can add a -mask option to it going forward
Cheers
Bruce

From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
<freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> On Behalf Of Antonín Škoch
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 1:16 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Computing thickness from woT2.pial surfaces {Disarmed}


        External Email - Use Caution

Hi, Bruce,

I did not find any mris_thickness command line option for masking medial wall 
during thickness computation.
The masking of ?h.thickness file ex post would not probably help, since it is 
not equivalent.
I tested this by running mris_anatomical_stats (which I suppose by principle 
takes medial wall into account) and obtained still slightly different results.
So I finally retreated to rerunning recon-all -pial and recon-all -T2pial and 
stored ?h.thickness of both processes.

Regards,

Antonin


You probably want to mask the medial wall

Bruce



On Dec 9, 2020, at 11:31 PM, Antonín Škoch <a...@ikem.cz<mailto:a...@ikem.cz>> 
wrote:





        External Email - Use Caution



Hi, Bruce,



in the meantime, I found the old thread



MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" 
claiming to be 
https://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg05989.html<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1aNvaY2F2Wzk88I3TCWDZ8sNnAxHgbRgs7ryiKYBIUsjQEMXKVjOhDjjv-tTq_A_mcp9_w3p_xfMYU4K3oN8ts9WChKgWsA9AtPmq5FF3Y6zzmD5t03nbQ2-r7t_sAfYx_dpfAZlYbPGy4CPfDSu5ieNyHQqLkZi45uWSi8DuXWenZA7BmM-pWlZxZ4Q1fqJJL4CMsQNSCkWdl9AWJSU5eX_iFpea_HkxRXx2lJwGl1ZMPlZDvcLsHctgVn_kEM4I-mofA4DczPVAZ5QS9mCTPw/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mail-archive.com%2Ffreesurfer%40nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmsg05989.html>



which suggests to set -N 20 parameter to mris_thickness to make thickness

computation consistent to mris_make_surfaces. Indeed, the values are now

consistent,

with exception of several thousands of vertices mainly around medial wall. Is

here any other option missing, which makes mris_thickness computed values of

thickness fully consistent to mris_make_surfaces?



Thank you in advance,



Antonin







Hi, Bruce,



thank you for the instructions!



I ran mris_thickness on one example subject to test the procedure. However,

inspecting the values of created thickness file, I encountered problem.

In many locations, the values of thickness file differ from the values of

thickness file created in recon-all -T2pial.

Even when the input files used for thickness measurement are (should) be the

same. (I double-checked my input surfaces,

when I use woT2.pial surface, the thickness values are different everywhere).



Attached see the binarized difference of these thickness files with the cursor,

where difference is zero (red spots)

and where is non-zero (transparent).



Could you please clarify, where could be the problem? Does not the thickness

computation in mris_make_surfaces use different options?

Could it be the reason, that I am operating with data processed by longitudinal

stream? (I don't think so...).



This inconsistence makes me puzzled.





Regards,



Antonin





Hi Antonín



You can specify what surfaces to use in mris_thickness:



mris_thickness -pial <path to pial surface> -white <path to white surface> …



cheers

Bruce



From:

freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>

<freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>

 On Behalf Of Antonín Škoch

Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 6:16 AM

To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>

Subject: [Freesurfer] Computing thickness from woT2.pial surfaces





        External Email - Use Caution

Dear experts,



I have processed my data with -T2pial option. I would like now to also compute

thickness from woT2.pial surfaces (i.e. surfaces created by T1 only). Is here a

comannd which does the trick, without running recon-all -pial (which rewrites

current .pial and .thickness files generatedy by -T2pial? I am using freeSurfer

version 6.0.



Thank you in advance,



Antonin Skoch
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to