This is not needed or recommended. Not needed because you are already
averaging over space and not recommended because it would cause one
region to bleed over into another.
On 11/3/2020 7:00 AM, Hye Min Shin wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Hello experts,
So I understand that when doing mri_glmfit you want to use smoothed
surface maps to comply with random field theory while controlling for
multiple comparisons (as discussed here: *MailScanner has detected a
possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be*
https://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg67902.html
<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1pNAU-NVIkRxQvX9B5btXENpnudT80URPA00UsXPU064w3aUW_OaoZyIsU5NouMPdeCqme_69nHwP4qY41_WBNPcHd8oC2GMFd1DoY894Y9xS_8eLF44pu50UoeiVxYWALBXvirnf1pwSIZJsIL3BAu2_Rp94HyBmMmFnKl7zmtONnvA8zyW5grRM_WBQqpGpdMgxR9TJh5-m4dkUtEnfYw/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mail-archive.com%2Ffreesurfer%40nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmsg67902.html>).
But I was also wondering whether we have to smooth surface maps when
using mri_anatomical_stats to extract anatomical measurements? I see
that mri_anatomical_stats has the option to smooth by # of iterations
but is there a way to know how many # of iterations would equal let's
say 15 FWHM?
Best,
Julia Shin
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
