it looks to me like recon-all finished without a problem. Have you looked at the outputs? Is there another reason you think there is an issue? There are lots of internal "error" metrics we use to optimize things that are not errors in the programatic sense - they are functionals we are minimizing/maximizing

cheers
Bruce


On Thu, 7 May 2020, jiahui wrote:


        External Email - Use Caution        

Hello FreeSurfer Developers,
I run the recon-all -all command:

this true error?how to resolve this problem?
 ERROR: 245/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=134. 782, avgs=0

250/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=134. 022, avgs=0

255/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=133.265, avgs=0

260/300: dt: 0.9000, rMS radial error=132.513, avgs=0

265/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=131. 766,

avgs=0

270/300: dt: 0.9000, rmS radial error=131. 022 ,

avgs=0

275/300: dt: 0.9000, rMS radial error=130 .283, avgs=o

280/300: dt: 0.9000, rMS radial error=129.548, avgs0

285/300: dt: 0.9000, rmS radial error=128.817 , avgs=0

290/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=128 .090, avgs=0

295/300: dt: 0.9000, rMS radial error=127 .367 , avgs=0

300/300: dt: 0.9000, rMs radial error=126.648, avgs=0

final distance error %24.71

pass 1: epoch 1 of 3 starting distance error %19.14

pass 1: epoch 2 of 3 starting distance error %19.08

starting distance error X19.04

final distance error %19.04

pass 1: epoch 1 of 3 starting distance error %19.50

pass 1: epoch 2 of 3 starting distance error %19.45

starting distance error %19. 41

final distance error %19.43

recon-all -s 100034 finished without error at 2020# 05A 05E

1) FreeSurfer version: freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-pub-v6.0.0-2be
b96c



 



 



 



 



 



 



 



 


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to