External Email - Use Caution        

I want to map the intensities of the volumes on its corresponding surface
in order to get the functional values on each vertex in each frame. I ran
recon-all for the anatomical volume and saved all outputs(mri,labels,surf
and etc.) in the bert folder. I use it because I need to specify the
required flag -s in bbregister in order to register the functional volume
to its anatomical volume.

Many thanks.

Best,
An

Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu> 于2019年11月18日周一 下午1:31写道:

> I don't understand what you are trying to do. I'm very confused by your
> mentioning of bert. What does bert have to do with any of your data?
>
> On 11/14/19 10:47 AM, An wrote:
> >
> >         External Email - Use Caution
> >
> > Oops sorry for the mistakenly reply. I will pay more attention in the
> > future.
> >
> > Bert is the folder with the anatomical data. I tried the following
> > steps with the 4D volume but failed. Then I checked the registration
> > result after bbregister and found that the volume was not registered.
> > After that I tried another 4D volume to do the steps and successfully
> > got the sampled intensity onto the surface.
> >
> > The difference between the new 4D volume I used and the previous one
> > is that there are two transformation matrices between them. The 4D
> > dataset that I previously used but failed is the volume already
> > registered to its anatomical volume(by using others tools). The new 4D
> > volume that I tried and succeed is the volume not registered.
> >
> > I have no idea why the 4D volume after the transformation would cause
> > a failed result. Could you please let me know that?
> >
> > Many thanks.
> >
> > Best,
> > An
> >
> > Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu
> > <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>> 于2019年11月13日周三 下午12:20写道:
> >
> >     If you have an anatomical MR that you have run through recon-all,
> >     then
> >     just use that one instead of bert in your steps below
> >     ps. Please remember to post to the FS list and not to us personally
> >
> >     On 11/12/19 8:41 PM, an wrote:
> >     >
> >     >         External Email - Use Caution
> >     >
> >     > Many thanks.
> >     >
> >     > I got the 4D fMRI dataset from others and it is not raw data. In
> >     order
> >     > to run mri_vol2surf, I need to calculate the register.dat for the
> >     > required flag --srcreg so I tried in this way.
> >     >
> >     > FYI, the 4D fMRI dataset should have been registered with its
> >     > anatomical MR volume by using other tools.
> >     >
> >     > For now I only ran the recon-all on its anatomical MR volume
> >     without
> >     > running the functional stream as I don't have the raw data.
> >     >
> >     > Should I also run the raw fMRI data from scratch by using
> >     functional
> >     > stream? Or if I can run mri_vol2surf independently, which command
> >     > should I use to get a register.dat file?
> >     > In addition, the intensity of the 4D fMRI dataset I have is between
> >     > [-1, 1] and not integers, would this cause any problem?
> >     >
> >     > Best,
> >     > An
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > On 11/12/19 10:41 AM, Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. wrote:
> >     >> Don't do the 1st step.
> >     >> Why are you registering it to bert? I'm pretty sure bert did not
> >     >> participate in your fmri study
> >     >> When you run mri_vol2surf, it will probably work better with
> >     >> --projfrac 0.5
> >     >>
> >     >> On 11/11/2019 1:32 PM, An wrote:
> >     >>>
> >     >>>         External Email - Use Caution
> >     >>>
> >     >>> Hi Prof. Greve,
> >     >>>
> >     >>> Thanks for your reply and sorry for the confusion.
> >     >>>
> >     >>> I have a 4D fMRI dataset with 10 time frames, where the
> >     intensity of
> >     >>> each voxel is between [-1,1] and not integers. I want to map the
> >     >>> intensities of the volumes on its corresponding surface in
> >     order to
> >     >>> get the functional values on each vertex in each frame. I have
> >     >>> already run its corresponding anatomical image in freesurfer.
> >     >>>
> >     >>> To achieve it, I tried the following steps:
> >     >>> 1. conform the fmri series by using mri_convert
> >     >>> 2. register the fmri series with the anatomy image by using
> >     >>> bbregister: bbregister --mov /4Dvol.nii/ --s bert --reg
> >     register.dat
> >     >>> 3. assign values from volumes to each vertex by using
> >     mri_vol2surf:
> >     >>> mri_vol2surf --src /4Dvol.nii /--out/lhtest.mgz/ --srcreg
> >     >>> register.dat --hemi lh
> >     >>>     I also tried the -regheader in mri_vol2surf: mri_vol2surf
> >     --src
> >     >>> /4Dvol.nii /--out/lhtest.mgz/ --regheader bert --hemi lh
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>> The /4Dvol.nii /aligns very well with the orig.mgz in
> >     freeview. But
> >     >>> after step2, the registered volume looks wrong. I am wondering
> >     could
> >     >>> I use bbregister to register multi-frame fMRI series to a single
> >     >>> volume?
> >     >>> I also tried to use --regheader to replace the --srcreg file in
> >     >>> mri_vol2surf as the output register.dat in step2 is wrong. But
> >     the
> >     >>> output is still wrong.
> >     >>>
> >     >>> Many thanks.
> >     >>>
> >     >>> Best,
> >     >>> An
> >     >>>
> >     >>> Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu
> >     <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>
> >     >>> <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu
> >     <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>>> 于2019年11月11日周一 下午12:16写道:
> >     >>>
> >     >>>     When you say it is 4D, what do you mean? That each label
> >     has its
> >     >>>     own frame?
> >     >>>
> >     >>>     On 11/6/19 5:59 PM, 曲岸 wrote:
> >     >>>     >
> >     >>>     >         External Email - Use Caution
> >     >>>     >
> >     >>>     > Hi there,
> >     >>>     >
> >     >>>     > I am working with creating a surface parcellation from a
> >     >>>     volumetric
> >     >>>     > parcellation and have some questions as follows:
> >     >>>     >
> >     >>>     > 1. If the volumetric parcellation is a labeled 4D
> >     multi-frame
> >     >>>     dataset,
> >     >>>     > could I still use the mris_sample_parc? Or could
> >     mri_vol2surf
> >     >>>     get the
> >     >>>     > sampled labels for every vertex?
> >     >>>     >
> >     >>>     > 2. For the 4D multi-frame dataset and mri_vol2surf output
> >     >>>     results,
> >     >>>     > which GUI should I use to visualize it? I tried freeview
> >     for 4D
> >     >>>     > multi-frame dataset but it looks weird.
> >     >>>     >
> >     >>>     > 3. Is there any command to separate multi-frame volume to
> >     >>>     single frame
> >     >>>     > volumes?
> >     >>>     >
> >     >>>     > Many thanks!
> >     >>>     >
> >     >>>     >
> >     >>>     > Best,
> >     >>>     > An
> >     >>>     >
> >     >>>     > _______________________________________________
> >     >>>     > Freesurfer mailing list
> >     >>>     > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> >     >>>     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
> >     >>>     >
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>>  _______________________________________________
> >     >>>     Freesurfer mailing list
> >     >>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> >     >>>     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
> >     >>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>> _______________________________________________
> >     >>> Freesurfer mailing list
> >     >>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> >     >>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >> _______________________________________________
> >     >> Freesurfer mailing list
> >     >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> >     >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >     >
> >
> >
> >
> >     The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to
> >     whom it is
> >     addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and
> >     the e-mail
> >     contains patient information, please contact the Partners
> >     Compliance HelpLine at
> >     http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to
> >     you in error
> >     but does not contain patient information, please contact the
> >     sender and properly
> >     dispose of the e-mail.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freesurfer mailing list
> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to