External Email - Use Caution        

Freesurfers,


First of all, I'd like to express my gratitude to the community for the support 
that keeps researchers like myself afloat!



I have a unique set of oncology patients that I want to evaluate for brain 
atrophy in a retrospective longitudinal analysis.

I was thinking about using Aseg.auto results to assess longitudinal volume 
changes, but before I invest all the time I wanted to check with the community 
whether this makes any sense at all:


The dataset that looks like this:

- 22 patients (no control dataset [yet])

- 10-25 MRIs per patient acquired over 2-8 years in relatively uniform intervals

- Patients had most of their scans on the same scanner, but scanners differed 
widely between patients

- All patients have axial T1 post gadolinium scans of 1x1x5mm resolution (3D 
acquisition available in <10%)

- About 80% of scans have an axial pre-contrast T1 sequence

- All scans are skullstripped (third party algorithm)


I'm looking for crude changes, no subtleties; volumes of interest are:

- Whole brain volume

- White matter volume

- Ventricular volume (mainly lateral ventricle)

- Subcortical gray matter volume (whole thalamus most importantly)


I ran a few test analyses and to my surprise I was able to generate pretty 
acceptable surfaces, however, topology fixing took about 24H per scan, and I 
feel aseg.auto contained all the volumetric data I was really interested in.


My concrete questions are:

1) Does the full autorecon pipeline affect Aseg.auto? If there is no benefit, I 
could reduce the per scan analysis time from 28 hours to 1-2 h.

2) Would this low-resolution dataset be accepted by reviewers if used for Aseg? 
Should I do any quantitative validation beyond a visual quality analysis of 
Aseg?

3) Can I perform a longitudinal analysis only for the Aseg results?

4) Is it OK to use T1-gad images for the analysis?


I'd appreciate any input!


Best regards,

David O. Kamson, MD PhD

Neuro-oncology fellow

Johns Hopkins Hospital &

National Institutes of Health


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to