The surface resolution is set during the recon-all analysis and is uninfluenced by the PET data
On 3/7/19 3:16 AM, Matthieu VANHOUTTE wrote: > External Email - Use Caution > > Ok so if I well understand surface in the gtmseg space would not have > finer resolution than surface in native space (big voxel)? > > On 06/03/2019 23:48, Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. wrote: >> I don't think so. The surfaces are at about 1mm resolution, which should >> be fine for this. The reason that RBV had to be upsampled is that there >> is no way to represent the different tissue types at a single (big) voxel >> >> On 3/6/19 4:46 PM, Matthieu Vanhoutte wrote: >>> External Email - Use Caution >>> >>> Dear Douglas, >>> >>> RBV PVC use the advantage of upsampled gtmseg space at 0.5 mm3 to >>> compute PVCorrected images. Would it be beneficial to project this >>> PVCorrected images onto gtmseg space surfaces to keep this upsampled >>> resolution ? >>> >>> Or would it be equivalent to project these PVCorrected images on >>> gtmseg space onto native surfaces using --reg rbv2anat.lta ? >>> >>> Best, >>> Matthieu >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Freesurfer mailing list >>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >> _______________________________________________ >> Freesurfer mailing list >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
