External Email - Use Caution        

Hi Douglas,

Could you answer to my previous question ?

Best,
Matthieu

> Le 30 janv. 2019 à 14:48, Matthieu Vanhoutte <matthieuvanhou...@gmail.com> a 
> écrit :
> 
> Hi Douglas,
> 
> In order to apply intensity normalization to non-PVC PET images based on mean 
> intensity from reference region in gtmseg.mgz, is it better to realign & 
> reslice PET image onto gtmseg space or the reverse way ? How is it done when 
> dealing with PVC images using gtmpvc command ?
> 
> I would like to avoid too many reslicing operations before volume to surface 
> projection, how would you deal with it ?
> 
> Best,
> Matthieu
> 
>> Le 28 janv. 2019 à 17:41, Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu 
>> <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>> a écrit :
>> 
>> If you intend to use one of the aseg structures, then they are the same. 
>> 
>> On 1/28/19 10:14 AM, Matthieu Vanhoutte wrote:
>>>         External Email - Use Caution        
>>> 
>>> Hi Douglas,
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Le 25 janv. 2019 à 18:01, Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu 
>>>> <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>> a écrit :
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 1/25/19 7:57 AM, Matthieu Vanhoutte wrote:
>>>>>         External Email - Use Caution        
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dear Douglas,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Could you precise me:
>>>>> 1) Is the intensity rescaling of PET image included in the mri_gtmpvc 
>>>>> command based on reference region in gtmseg.mgz file rather than aseg.mgz 
>>>>> ?
>>>> It depends. If you are using pons, then that is not part of the aseg and 
>>>> is generated as part of the creation of gtmseg. But most of the rest of 
>>>> gtmseg is derived from the aseg and surfaces.
>>> 
>>> Is it better to use gtmseg.mgz or aseg.mgz to extract reference region’s 
>>> mean intensity ?
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>> 2) Is this rescaling applied before PVE correction or after (i.e. based 
>>>>> on PVE corrected reference region’s mean intensity) ?
>>>> After
>>>>> 
>>>>> Many thanks in advance for helping.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Matthieu
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Le 7 janv. 2019 à 17:26, Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu 
>>>>>> <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>> a écrit :
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 1/7/19 11:18 AM, Matthieu Vanhoutte wrote:
>>>>>>>         External Email - Use Caution        
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I used the following command to obtain only rescaled voxel-wise PET 
>>>>>>> image (with no PVC):
>>>>>>> mri_gtmpvc --i PET.nii.gz --reg Pet2T1.register.dof6.lta --psf 0 
>>>>>>> --no-tfe --seg gtmseg.mgz --default-seg-merge --auto-mask PSF .01 --rbv 
>>>>>>> --o  nopvc
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If I omitted --rbv or --mgx option I didn't get the rescaled voxel-wise 
>>>>>>> PET image (without PVC). Could I obtain the rescaled voxel-wise PET 
>>>>>>> image (without PVC) just by dividing each voxel of the native PET image 
>>>>>>> by the mean of the reference region ?
>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Le lun. 7 janv. 2019 à 16:01, Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. 
>>>>>>> <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>> a écrit :
>>>>>>> I'm not sure what you mean. If you are turning off PVC, why are you 
>>>>>>> computing RBV and MGX? What is your command line? What do you mean that 
>>>>>>> these options don't seem to work?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 12/21/18 2:22 PM, Matthieu Vanhoutte wrote:
>>>>>>>>         External Email - Use Caution        
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi Douglas,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks for helping.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> To have an only rescaled voxel-wise PET image, these options seem to 
>>>>>>>> work only when -rbv method is used and not -mgx.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Do you know why ?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> Matthieu 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Le mar. 18 déc. 2018 à 17:58, Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. 
>>>>>>>> <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>> You will need to set --psf 0 and --no-tfe to fully turn off PVC. 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 12/18/18 4:50 AM, Matthieu Vanhoutte wrote:
>>>>>>>>>         External Email - Use Caution        
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi Douglas,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Could you help me on this point ?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>> Matthieu
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Le mer. 12 déc. 2018 à 10:50, Matthieu Vanhoutte 
>>>>>>>>> <matthieuvanhou...@gmail.com <mailto:matthieuvanhou...@gmail.com>> a 
>>>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>>> Dear Douglas,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Is it possible to use mri_gtmpvc command in order to intensity 
>>>>>>>>> normalize PET images without applying PVE correction by setting --psf 
>>>>>>>>> to 0 ?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>> Matthieu
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>>>>>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer 
>>>>>>>>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>>>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>>>>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer 
>>>>>>>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>>>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>>>>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer 
>>>>>>>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>>>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer 
>>>>>>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>>>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer 
>>>>>>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer 
>>>>>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer 
>>>>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer 
>>>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer 
>>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> 

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to