Not for cortical analysis. You might be able to get something useful from subcortical analysis
On 1/22/19 12:15 PM, Sahnoune,Iman wrote: > > External Email - Use Caution > > Hello, > > I’m writing to ask whether clinical scans with thickness of 5mm are > currently able to be analyzed using Freesurfer? This question has been > asked in the archives, but it has been about 5 years so just writing > to see whether that has changed or if a work around has been > developed. Alternatively, the option exists to computationally make > the slices thinner. Would running the software either as 5mm or > thinner slices yield accurate and useful information cortically and > subcortically? > > Thank you in advance for your help. > > The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, > confidential, and/or protected from disclosure. This e-mail message > may contain protected health information (PHI); dissemination of PHI > should comply with applicable federal and state laws. If you are not > the intended recipient, or an authorized representative of the > intended recipient, any further review, disclosure, use, > dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any > attachment (or the information contained therein) is strictly > prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in > error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete all > references to it and its contents from your systems. > > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
