External Email - Use Caution Hi Bruce,
I don't think it is.. It would of course be impossible to establish a 1:1 correspondence between regions, given that the H.-Oxf. is based on volumetric labeling of folding patterns. Assuming there is no quantitative correspondence/transformation, if one were to still want to establish a correspondence between regions of the two atlaes, would one be only left with doing this manually/by eyeballing, e.g. by doing a volumetric projection of the DKT (if that is even possible) and viewing that superimposed on the H._Oxf? Cheers Tudor On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 at 16:42, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: > Hi Tudor > > sorry, I don't think there is a direct correspondence. Is the Oxford > atlas even on the surface? > > cheers > Bruce > On Thu, 29 Nov 2018, Tudor Popescu wrote: > > > > > External Email - Use Caution > > > > Dear FreeSurfer experts, > > > > I have a network of interest described in terms of regions from the > Harvard-Oxford atlas. I would > > next need to describe this network in terms of regions from the DKT > (Desikan–Killiany–Tourville) > > atlas. > > > > I have not found hints of any correspondence table or script among the > files in the > > dataverse.harvard.edu repository, nor in the Klein&Tourville 2012 > paper. How is this sort of > > correspondence best established, in a way that also quantifies the > transformation's accuracy (amount > > of overlap) for each parcelated region? Many thanks! > > > > Best wishes, > > Tudor > > > >_______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
