External Email - Use Caution        

Thanks for your help :)
Going on with the use Free Surfer!!

Regards,
Rosalia

El dom., 18 nov. 2018 17:11, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
escribió:

> overlay the white and pial surfaces and see if the skull is included
> inside
> the pial
>
> On Sun, 18 Nov
> 2018, Rosalia Dacosta Aguayo wrote:
>
> >
> >         External Email - Use Caution
> >
> > Hi  Bruce,
> > Thank you a lot for your reply. How could I inspect if affects the
> surfaces?
> >
> > Yours sincerely,
> > Rosalia
> >
> >
> > El dom., 18 nov. 2018 16:58, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> escribió:
> >       that should work ok. It only matter if it affects the surfaces
> though (or
> >       the aseg)
> >       cheers
> >       Bruce
> >
> >       On Sun, 18 Nov 2018, Rosalia Dacosta Aguayo wrote:
> >
> >       >
> >       >         External Email - Use Caution
> >       >
> >       > Hi Bruce,
> >       > Sorry for my intromission.
> >       > I am replacing the brainmask because dura mater or skull were
> left behind with
> >       independence of the
> >       > WM and GM segmemtation. Does this is useless?
> >       >
> >       > Regards,
> >       > Rosalia
> >       >
> >       > El dom., 18 nov. 2018 16:16, Bruce Fischl <
> fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> escribió:
> >       >       Hi yujunjie
> >       >
> >       >       you need to look at the *.nofix surfaces and see where the
> defect is.
> >       >       Skull and neck being left is around isn't a problem unless
> they are
> >       >       included in the surfaces.
> >       >
> >       >       cheers
> >       >       Bruce
> >       >       On Sun, 18 Nov 2018, 1013364183 wrote:
> >       >
> >       >       >
> >       >       >         External Email - Use Caution
> >       >       >
> >       >       > Dear Bruce Fischl,
> >       >       >   Thank you very much for your reply. I checked the
> effect of going down the
> >       skull and
> >       >       found that a
> >       >       > large part of the skull has not been removed. The
> appendix contains images of
> >       skull
> >       >       removal. I want
> >       >       > to know how we should handle it.
> >       >       >
> >       >       > yours yujunjie
> >       >       > ------------------ Original ------------------
> >       >       > From:  "Bruce Fischl"<fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>;
> >       >       > Date:  Sun, Nov 18, 2018 00:10 AM
> >       >       > To:  "Freesurfer support list"<
> freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>;
> >       >       > Subject:  Re: [Freesurfer] Modify defect failed
> >       >       >
> >       >       > Hi yujunjie
> >       >       >
> >       >       > the last entry in the log file is:
> >       >       >
> >       >       > CORRECTING DEFECT 5 (vertices=53772, convex hull=1434,
> v0=15308)
> >       >       > XL defect detected...
> >       >       >
> >       >       >
> >       >       > this is a giant defect - about 1/4 of your total
> surface. It means that
> >       >       > something major went wrong - skull attached, or hemis
> connected or
> >       >       > something. You should look at the rh.orig.nofix and the
> >       >       > rh.inflated.nofix surfaces to see what it is.
> >       >       >
> >       >       > cheers
> >       >       > Bruce
> >       >       >
> >       >       >
> >       >       > On Sat, 17
> >       >       > Nov 2018, 1013364183 wrote:
> >       >       >
> >       >       > >
> >       >       > >  External Email - Use Caution
> >       >       > >
> >       >       > > Dear FS,
> >       >       > >  I ran the recon-all command and it failed to fix it
> for many days when I
> >       fixed the
> >       >       defect. I have
> >       >       > > modified the threshold of the split algorithm. I want
> to know if there are
> >       other
> >       >       ways to fix the
> >       >       > Its
> >       >       > > log file is in the attachment.
> >       >       > >
> >       >       > > Thank you in advance
> >       >       > >
> >       >       > > yours yujunjie
> >       >       > >
> >       >       > >
> >       >       > _______________________________________________
> >       >       > Freesurfer mailing list
> >       >       > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >       >       >
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >       >       >
> >       >       >_______________________________________________
> >       >       Freesurfer mailing list
> >       >       Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >       >
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >       >
> >       >
> >       >_______________________________________________
> >       Freesurfer mailing list
> >       Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >       https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to