Hello,

I am using mri_surf2surf and would like to use the vertex map method nnf 
("neighest neighbor, forward only") which according to the --help description 
exists and avoids multiple source vertices to be mapped and averaged onto a 
single target vertex (crucial to my analysis here). However, when I run this 
the output suggests that it is running the nnfr (neighest-neighbor forward and 
reverse) method.

Is this a bug or am I misinterpreting the console output?


This is the command and output:


/usr/local/freesurfer/dev/bin/mri_surf2surf --srcsubject 994273 --sval 
994273/Results/Orientations/lh_SSangle_depth00_rfMRI_REST1_LR.mgz --trgsubject 
fsaverage --mapmethod nnf --o lh_SSangle_depth00_rfMRI_REST1_LR_inFSAv.mgz 
--hemi lh

sysname  Linux
machine  x86_64
user     omv4
srcsubject = 994273
srcval     = 994273/Results/Orientations/lh_SSangle_depth00_rfMRI_REST1_LR.mgz
srctype    =
trgsubject = fsaverage
trgval     = lh_SSangle_depth00_rfMRI_REST1_LR_inFSAv.mgz
trgtype    =
srcsurfreg = sphere.reg
trgsurfreg = sphere.reg
srchemi    = lh
trghemi    = lh
frame      = 0
fwhm-in    = 0
fwhm-out   = 0
label-src  = (null)
label-trg  = (null)
OKToRevFaceOrder  = 1
UseDualHemi = 0
Reading source surface reg 
/cluster/olivia/Data/994273/T1w/994273/surf/lh.sphere.reg
Loading source data
Reading target surface reg 
/cluster/olivia/Data/994273/T1w/fsaverage/surf/lh.sphere.reg
Done
Using surf2surf_nnfr()
Mapping Source Volume onto Source Subject Surface
surf2surf_nnfr: building source hash (res=16).
Surf2Surf: Forward Loop (163842)
Surf2Surf: Dividing by number of hits (163842)
INFO: nSrcLost = 26240
nTrg121 = 163842, nTrgMulti =     0, MnTrgMultiHits = 0
nSrc121 = 78298, nSrcLost = 26240, nSrcMulti = 62974, MnSrcMultiHits = 1.3584
Saving target data
Saving to lh_SSangle_depth00_rfMRI_REST1_LR_inFSAv.mgz



I'd appreciate any suggestions.

Thanks

Olivia


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to