External Email - Use Caution Hello Doug,
We are doing one test I supposed. Because we inputted all covariates into glm_fit. This is our command line. We entered all behavioral scores as covariates and obtained each folder named as covariate's name with sig.mgh in each folder. Does it mean we only have just one test, or several tests if we did the below way? Best regards, Jahanvi mri_glmfit \ --glmdir GLM_dir_corr_behavior_lh_CT_tp1_tp2_plus_FFMQ_f1_f2 \ --y lh.testretest_only_TP2.thickness-pc1.stack.fwhm15.mgh \ --label lh.testretest.fsaverage.cortex.label \ --fsgd GLM_dir_corr_behavior_lh_CT_tp1_tp2_plus_FFMQ_f1_f2/TP1_TP2.fsgd \ --C GLM_dir_corr_behavior_lh_CT_tp1_tp2_plus_FFMQ_f1_f2/contrasts/main.mtx \ --C GLM_dir_corr_behavior_lh_CT_tp1_tp2_plus_FFMQ_f1_f2/contrasts/Delta_age.mtx \ --C GLM_dir_corr_behavior_lh_CT_tp1_tp2_plus_FFMQ_f1_f2/contrasts/Delta_CesD_score.mtx \ --C GLM_dir_corr_behavior_lh_CT_tp1_tp2_plus_FFMQ_f1_f2/contrasts/Delta_STATI_state.mtx \ --C GLM_dir_corr_behavior_lh_CT_tp1_tp2_plus_FFMQ_f1_f2/contrasts/Delta_STATI_trait.mtx \ --C GLM_dir_corr_behavior_lh_CT_tp1_tp2_plus_FFMQ_f1_f2/contrasts/Delta_total_medi_min.mtx \ --C GLM_dir_corr_behavior_lh_CT_tp1_tp2_plus_FFMQ_f1_f2/contrasts/Delta_FFMQ_f1.mtx \ --C GLM_dir_corr_behavior_lh_CT_tp1_tp2_plus_FFMQ_f1_f2/contrasts/Delta_FFMQ_f2.mtx \ --surf fsaverage lh > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 10:45:42 -0400 > From: Douglas Greve <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu> > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Question about GLM results in Freesurfer > To: <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > Message-ID: <10e16d65-9ac1-c85c-875d-405e852ce...@mgh.harvard.edu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > Are you doing 5 different tests or just one test? It is a tricky > question as to whether you should correct across? 5 tests or not. > Ideally, one should, but I don't think I've ever seen it done in > practice. As a reviewer, I might not demand it for only 5 tests. On 6/20/18 9:17 AM, jahanvi patel wrote: > > > Hello, > > We have a question about using glm_fit in freesurfer. > > When we model several covariates (behavioral scores) in glm, and we > wanted to know the correlation between cortical thickness changes with > the changes of behavioral scores.? We obtained the correlation results > nicely after using freesurfer's monte carlo correction (eg. increase > of behavioral scores is correlated with the increase of cortical > thickness changes). > > Should we still perform the bonefferi corrections on the results we got ? > (because we have entered?5 covariates into the glm?model, so we are > wondering if it is still needed to divide the?alpha-value by 5 > to?determine the final significant findings)? > > > Thank you so much for helping us, > > Jahanvi > > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
