Are you confusing GI with LGI? > On Dec 22, 2017, at 4:33 PM, Martin Juneja <mj70...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I came across several papers e.g. > http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158215000856 where > gyrification index (GI) is indicated in 'mm'. > > By definition GI is the ratio of two quantities: inner contour/outer contour > (http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Gyrification), therefore, shouldn't GI be > 'unitless' then? > > I am not sure which way is this correct? > > Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
