Dear Doug,

I think that is essentially what I figured. Based on remarks in other posts, my 
steps for evaluating laterality index entail applying:


(1). Apply mri_preproc for each subject $SUB and $meas (area or thickness) 
individually using -xhemi flag but without any paired differences via:
> mris_preproc --target fsaverage_sym --hemi lh --xhemi --srcsurfreg 
> fsaverage_sym.sphere.reg --meas $meas --out  ${SUB}_out.mgh --s $SUB
Result is a surface file with two volumes (lh and xhemi-lh) called 
${SUB}_out.mgh for each subject.

(2). Smooth the two volumes in ${SUB}_out.mgh at a given $fwhm (5, 10, 15...):
> mris_fwhm --s fsaverage_sym --hemi lh --cortex --smooth-only --fwhm $fwhm  
> --i ${SUB}_out.mgh --o ${SUB}_out-sm${fwhm}.mgh
to create a surface file with two volumes whose values are smoothed at fwhm = 
$fwhm.

(3). Compute laterality index over the surface for each subject via 
paired-diff-norm:
> mri_concat ${SUB}_out-sm${fwhm}.mgh --paired-diff-norm --o 
> ${SUB}_latIndex-sm${fwhm}.mgh
where ${SUB}_latIndex-sm${fwhm}.mgh is the surface file with laterality index 
for subject $SUB (after smoothing measures over left and right hemispheres).

(4). Stack laterality indices for each subject in sample G  (of n subjects) 
into a single mgh,
> mri_concat --i  SUB1_latIndex-sm${fwhm}.mgh --i  SUB2_latIndex-sm${fwhm}.mgh 
> ....... --i  SUBn_latIndex-sm${fwhm}.mgh --out --i  
> sampleG_latIndex-sm${fwhm}.mgh.

(5) Run glm with designed matrix sampleG_design.txt containing n rows of 
covariates for SUB1, SUB2, ..., SUBn (in order) via:
> mri_glmfit --y sampleG_latIndex-sm${fwhm}.mgh --X $sampleG_design.txt 
> --no-rescale-x --glmdir glm_sampleG --C con1.mat --surf fsaverage_sym lh

The whole purpose of this exercise + question was that I need to fit the GLM 
over subsets of the sample for sensitivity analysis to determine whether 
significance for the contrast in con1.mat (say slope of an IV, such as age) 
depends on patterns of based on demographics groups (such as gender). I suppose 
alternatively, I could just as well fit another GLMs with a design matrix 
modeling interactions between age and gender to make my evaluation, over the 
same set of stacked surfaces for the full sample.

Thank you.

Best,
Chintan


  1.
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to