Hi Doug, I wonder what is the difference between this approach (mri_surf2vol) as opposed to doing the MRTM2 modelling on the MGX GM output (58 frames), which will give us the bp.nii.gz in volume space?
Thanks. Best Wishes, Elijah > On 13 Oct 2017, at 16:19, Douglas Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: > > do you mean you want to map the surface-based data into the volume? If > so, you can use mri_surf2vol. If you want to analyze your pet data in > the volume you can just do that with mri_glmfit > > > On 10/5/17 4:59 PM, Elijah Mak wrote: >> Hi Doug, >> >> Referring to the PETSURFER tutorial for dynamic PET data, I am wondering if >> it is possible to obtain a volume-based equivalent of >> mrtm2.lh.sm05/bp.nii.gz? As I understand, bp.nii.gz is the partial-volumed >> corrected output that has been sampled onto the fsaverage surface. >> >> Thanks for your time again. >> >> Best Wishes, >> Elijah >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Freesurfer mailing list >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine > at > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in > error > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and > properly > dispose of the e-mail. > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
