Hello FS experts, I am correlating some of the behavioral measures with cortical thickness (CT) and cortical gyrification (CG) measures.
- For CT-behavioral: I have some expected results after correcting for multiple comparisons using mri_glmfit-sim - For CG-behavioral: Again, I have some expected results (more expected that CT-behavioral results) - only 3 clusters (sig.mgh result) but none of those survived after correcting for multiple comparisons using PALM, I can't use mri_glmfit-sim because my design is non-orthogonal. I also learnt from FS discussion forum and literature that CG is already extremely smooth so it would require large area to survive multiple comparisons correction. I was wondering if I can report my CG results based on this argument. If yes, then any more suggestions/references which I can use as arguments to justify my CG findings, that would really help. Thanks.
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
