what is your mri_glmfit command line?

On 07/12/2017 02:32 PM, Bruss, Joel E wrote:
> I have a group of subjects, scans at time1 and time2 that have been 
> run through the longitudinal stream.  I have a group of ROIs in MNI 
> space that I've been able to push up to fsaverage following the 
> VolumeRoiCorticalThickness tutorial:
>
> https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/VolumeRoiCorticalThickness
>
> Further, I've used mri_surf2surf to push the mgh file to each subject.
>
> I'm using mri_segstats to pull out mean thickness and a few other 
> variables.  If I load the mgh into tksurfer and create a label by hand 
> (~99% the same), I can use mris_anatomical_stats which will also 
> output surface area.  I can also use the label with mri_segstats 
> (--slabel) to calculate the thickness, etc. and those values match the 
> ones from mris_anatomical_stats.
>
> Based on the input (mgh or label), I get either voxels or vertices.  
> While not exactly the same and possibly due to creating the label by 
> hand, the numbers are very close. However, the volume reported 
> (GrayVol for mris_anatomical_stats, Volume_mm3 for mri_segstats) are 
> really different between the two methods.  In checking a few subjects, 
> the volume reported for mris_anatomical_stats is usually 2-3 times 
> larger than mri_segstats.  Why is this?  Which volume is correct?  Is 
> there a way to make one program calculate a volume more in line with 
> the other?  Less important, is there a way to force mri_segstats to 
> output surface area?
>
> Thank you for taking the time to read this
>
> -Joel
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered 
> by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and 
> is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it 
> is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, 
> confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you 
> are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or 
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, please notify the sender 
> immediately and delete or destroy all copies of the original message 
> and attachments thereto. Email sent to or from UI Health Care may be 
> retained as required by law or regulation. Thank you.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

-- 
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to