Dear Doug,

the subject with leak of white surface outside brain (my first post with 
screenshots) is subject 1. Slice number (coronal) around 100.
The subject in second post (with text below) is subject 2, slice number 
(coronal) also 100.

I have processed the subjects with v 6.0 (in fact dev version from feb 2017, 
but this is irrelevant) with -cubic -no-mprage. It looks much like v5.3, i.e. 
the wm.mgz and surfaces are much better, but v5.3 looks still better, at least 
for subject 1. 
I have uploaded them as file v6.0_cubic_no_mprage.tar.gz to your ftp site.

The optical difference in norm.mgz/brain.mgz between v5.3 and v6.0 with -cubic 
is very minor, but still there is some other thing which renders wm.mgz worse 
than with v5.3 for subject 1.
The -cubic has profound effect, the images seem much smooth with lose of 
contrast without using -cubic.

Regards,

Antonin


And what slice number?
On 04/24/2017 11:16 AM, Douglas N Greve wrote:
> Anonin, of the three subjects you sent, which one is shown in these 
> pictures?
>
>
> On 04/19/2017 05:23 PM, Antonin Skoch wrote:
>> Dear experts,
>>
>> I am sending just one more example to illustrate issue with white 
>> surface estimation in v6.0. See the attached screenshots: In v6.0 
>> there seems to be insufficient contrast in brain.finalsurfs.mgz, so 
>> the white surface is leaking at three spots dramatically outwards 
>> towards pial surface. The white surface in v5.3 looks much more 
>> anatomically relevant in the same spot.
>>
>> Could you please comment on how to avoid such issues in v.6.0?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Antonin Skoch
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to