Hi Dorian

you can load the aparc.annot for each subject and use it to chek if the 
spherical registration worked ok. It's easy enough to write a script to 
load these for each subject, then write a tif file with a medial view, and 
zip through them all with nmovie

cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, Dorian P. wrote:

> Thank you Bruce, Douglas.
> Yes, I think thicknesses were obtained with v 5.3.0. There might be errors
> as Bruce pointed out, I am going now through all maps to check them. This
> makes me think of a question. Volumetric template registrations sometimes go
> wrong. Does this happen also to surface registrations in FS sometimes ???
> 
> I am using other statistics, not glm, but thanks for suggesting it. Data are
> imported and exported in R using some R functions I built myself, nothing
> fancy, just using intermediate text files to get what I want and put it back
> for visualization.
> 
> Thank you
> 
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> wrote:
> 
>
>       On 03/08/2017 09:27 PM, Dorian P. wrote:
>       > Hi Freesurfers,
>       >
>       > I am using R to perform thickness analyses. All subjects are
>       > transformed in fsaverage space and all values are placed in a
>       matrix
>       > with 327684 columns (163842 for each hemisphere). I put the
>       results
>       > back in a surface file (.asc format) and then convert it to a
>       binary
>       > Freesurfer format. I then open the files in Freesurfer to view
>       them.
>       >
>       > Overall the results make sense and fall in the right places.
>       But I am
>       > concerned that some results fall into the corpus callosum,
>       which, if I
>       > remember correctly should not have any thickness value, and
>       therefore
>       > no results.
>       >
>       > Here is a screenshot:
>       > Inline image 1
>       >
>       > Can someone help my understand what might be wrong? Or, if
>       this is
>       > normal, why I am finding thickness results where there is no
>       thickness?
>       Is this 5.3? The thickness may not be 0 in the medial wall, but
>       non-zero
>       values are meaningless and should be masked out or ignored.
>       >
>       > Is there a way to find label numbers for each vertex in
>       fsaverage
>       > space (i.e. list of parcel number for each vertex). This might
>       be
>       > useful to exclude certain vertices or compute summery
>       statistics of
>       > the results directly in R.
>       You can load the annotation into matlab with read_annotation.m
>       >
>       > Third question, is it possible to threshold the above map
>       based on
>       > minimal cluster area (i.e., in mri_surfcluster). If yes, do I
>       need to
>       > prepare a binary file with p-values for thresholding (0-1), or
>       can I
>       > use mri_surfcluster with t-score maps (0-Inf)?
>       You can use any map you want, you just have to specify the
>       threshold
>       correctly. Also, you will need to have a FWHM. To get this I
>       would run
>       an analysis in mri_glmfit using a design similar to what you
>       used in R
>       (small differences probably won't affect the FWHM measure).
>       >
>       > Thank you for your help.
>       > Dorian
>       >
>       >
>       >
>       > _______________________________________________
>       > Freesurfer mailing list
>       > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>       > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>       --
>       Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
>       MGH-NMR Center
>       gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>       Phone Number: 617-724-2358
>       Fax: 617-726-7422
>
>       Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
>       FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
>       www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
>       Outgoing:
>       ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
>
>       _______________________________________________
>       Freesurfer mailing list
>       Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>       https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> 
>
>       The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person
>       to whom it is
>       addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error
>       and the e-mail
>       contains patient information, please contact the Partners
>       Compliance HelpLine at
>       http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent
>       to you in error
>       but does not contain patient information, please contact the
>       sender and properly
>       dispose of the e-mail.
> 
> 
> 
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to