Hi Dong, it can work, if time points are close to each other (so not much head growth). Feel free to try, but make sure you are carefully looking at the surfaces, that no gray matter is clipped in later time points.
The alternative is to only do cross sectional processing. Best, Martin > On 14 Feb 2017, at 04:56, Dongnandi <dongnan...@163.com> wrote: > > Dear freesurfer exports, > > As it is mentioned in the documentation that ‘pediatric data violates the > fixed head size assumption’ for the current longitudinal stream. Is there any > solution for the issue now? > > Thanks > Dong > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer>
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
