Hi mailing list, regarding a previous issue with the v5.3.0 and the pial boundary crossing into the ventricles (below), i have run the subjects in the beta version and the problem does not appear.
My question to the experts is now, considering it is not advised to switch versions in a data set, how 'bad' would it be to run 7 subjects in the beta version, and the other 190 or so in the v5.3.0 version? It is after all a very small number of the total sample, would this be ok, or would you still advise against it? Many thanks, Areti ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Smaragdi A. [[email protected]] Sent: 12 January 2016 18:27 To: Freesurfer support list Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] (no subject) Hi Bruce, thanks for the quick reply, I am running v5.3.0 from a Linux, but more than 2/3 through my data set so don't really want to swap to 6.. Where can I get the beta and how would it help? Thanks, Areti ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Bruce Fischl [[email protected]] Sent: 12 January 2016 16:24 To: Freesurfer support list Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] (no subject) what version are you running? I believe that this is a bug that has been fixed. Hopefully we will get version 6 out soon and upgrading will fix this, but you can download a beta and try to make sure if you want cheers Bruce On Tue, 12 Jan 2016, Smaragdi A. wrote: > Hi mailing list, > > I have encountered this problem in Freesurfer a number of times now and I > wondered if any of you had any solutions. > > It seems that sometimes after a recon-all has been run, there is a large > overlap of the pial boundary and wm boundary, in the same region each time > near the lateral ventricles (it can be on either hemisphere or both). I have > attached a print screen of the issue, this time in the LH. As you can see, we > have tried adding CPs and have also added WM, but after re-running it, the > problem still exists. We have also tried running the randomness, but this has > had no effect. > > Any suggestions as to what we could do to fix this would be great - thank you! > > > > > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list [email protected] https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list [email protected] https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list [email protected] https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
