On 03/04/2016 10:06 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote: > what are you trying to achieve?
A per-subject ~10k vertex pial surface with a corresponding annot. We use it as a spatial domain for simulating neural activity; 150k vertices is too many for this purpose. > It might be easiest to use something like > fsaverage5 as the downsampled surface. Then you would just map your > subjects to fsaverage5 using the existing sphere.reg files If I understand correctly, different subjects would then have identical cortical geometry, which isn't sufficient for our use case, as we are calculating the forward solution for EEG/MEG which can depend on the individual's cortical geometry. Sorry if I've misunderstood your suggestion, I'm still a freesurfer noob. Thanks, Marmaduke _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
