Hi Angela

gyrification is the ratio of areas and hence dimensionless, so I would think it wouldn't be much affected by TIV.

cheers
Bruce


On Sun, 21 Feb 2016, angela.fav...@unipd.it wrote:

In the case of a gyrification analysis, does correction for total brain
volume make sense?

Angela

Inviato dal mio dispositivo Huawei

-------- Messaggio originale --------
Oggetto: Re: [Freesurfer] eTIV question
Da: Bruce Fischl
A: Freesurfer support list
CC:


      yes, it's a somewhat different and more conservative test. I
      guess you
      could check the talairach transforms of some of your subjects
      with eTIVs
      that don't make sense (or change the most over time) to try to
      see why
      this is happening. Or take Mike's suggestion and test a
      different (but
      probably still interesting) hypothesis

      On Sun, 21 Feb 2016, Angela Favaro wrote:

      > Hi, thank you
      > I think this would test something different: 'how much a brain
      area is
      > atrophic controlling for the average brain atrophy' and not
      'how much
      > a brain area is atrophic controlling for the individual
      differences in
      > head size'. Doesn't it?
      >
      > Angela
      >
      >
      > "Harms, Michael" ha scritto:
      >
      >> Hi,
      >> Why not use a measurement of brain size rather than “eTIV”?
      >>
      >> cheers,
      >> -MH
      >>
      >> --
      >> Michael Harms, Ph.D.
      >>
      >> -----------------------------------------------------------
      >> Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders
      >> Washington University School of Medicine
      >> Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
      >> 660 South Euclid Ave.Tel: 314-747-6173
      >> St. Louis, MO 63110Email: mha...@wustl.edu
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >> On 2/21/16, 6:06 AM, "freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
      on behalf of
      >> Angela Favaro" >> angela.fav...@unipd.it> wrote:
      >>
      >> there is a mistake in the graph, hippocampal volume is TIV2
      >> I apologize for that!
      >>
      >> Angela Favaro ha scritto:
      >>
      >>> Hi Bruce,
      >>> please find attached the graph of the correlation between
      the two time
      >>> point. I did not find outliers or failures. However the
      discrepancy
      >>> between TIVs is particularly high in few cases. Obviously
      these data
      >>> are those before running longitudinal streaming
      >>> This is a sample of adolescents with low body weight
      (anorexia nervosa).
      >>> In my previous study (on young adults with low weight) I
      found no
      >>> correlation between TIV and body weight and high
      correlations between
      >>> fs estimated TIV and manually segmented TIV (r=0.94 in the
      whole
      >>> sample and r=0.93 in the underweight sample (n=38)).
      >>> Do you think that the young age can be a factor? or patients
      who are
      >>> more acutely underweight?
      >>> Thank you for any suggestion
      >>>
      >>> Angela
      >>>
      >>>
      >>> Bruce Fischl ha scritto:
      >>>
      >>>> Hi Angel
      >>>>
      >>>> the time1/time2 correlation of eTIV is pretty worrisome.
      Are you sure
      >>>> that there aren't outliers/failures in that set?
      >>>>
      >>>> Bruce
      >>>>
      >>>>
      >>>> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016, angela.fav...@unipd.it wrote:
      >>>>
      >>>>> Dear Freesurfer experts,
      >>>>> I have a question about eTIV (FS 5.3) which I use as a
      covariate where
      >>>>> appropriate. Is it in some way influenced by the presence
      of brain
      >>>>> atrophy?
      >>>>> I have a new sample of subjects in a longitudinal study:
      at time 1 they
      >>>>> have some atrophy (due to low body weight) that improves
      in time 2 (4
      >>>>> months). I observed that eTIV-time1 is slightly correlated
      with weight
      >>>>> (r=0.3) whereas no correlation is present at time 2. The
      correlation
      >>>>> between eTIV-time1 and eTIV-time2 is somewhat lower than
      expected
      >>>>> (r=0.53)
      >>>>> and is lower than correlation between SegBrain_Vol_1 and
      SegBrain_Vol_2
      >>>>> (0.65).
      >>>>>
      >>>>> Do you suggest in these cases to perform manual
      segmentation to obtain
      >>>>> TIV? or is there any other method (in freesurfer) to
      obtain an
      >>>>> estimate of
      >>>>> TIV not influenced by brain atrophy? What about using
      BrainMask_to_TIV?
      >>>>>
      >>>>> Thank you for any suggestion
      >>>>>
      >>>>> Angela
      >>>>>
      >>>>>
      >>>>> _______________________________________________
      >>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
      >>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
      >>>>>
      https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
      >>>>>
      >>>>>
      >>>>>
      >>>> _______________________________________________
      >>>> Freesurfer mailing list
      >>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
      >>>>
      https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
      >>>>
      >>>>
      >>>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the
      person to whom
      >>>> it is
      >>>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in
      error and
      >>>> the e-mail
      >>>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners
      Compliance
      >>>> HelpLine at
      >>>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was
      sent to
      >>>> you in error
      >>>> but does not contain patient information, please contact
      the sender
      >>>> and properly
      >>>> dispose of the e-mail.
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >> _______________________________________________
      >> Freesurfer mailing list
      >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
      >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
      >>
      >>
      >> ________________________________
      >> The materials in this message are private and may contain
      Protected
      >> Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive
      nature.
      >> If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any
      >> unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any
      action in
      >> reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
      prohibited.
      >> If you have received this email in error, please immediately
      notify
      >> the sender via telephone or return mail.
      >>
      >> _______________________________________________
      >> Freesurfer mailing list
      >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
      >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > _______________________________________________
      > Freesurfer mailing list
      > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
      > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
      >
      >
      >
      _______________________________________________
      Freesurfer mailing list
      Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
      https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


      The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person
      to whom it is
      addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error
      and the e-mail
      contains patient information, please contact the Partners
      Compliance HelpLine at
      http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent
      to you in error
      but does not contain patient information, please contact the
      sender and properly
      dispose of the e-mail.


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to