Thank you for the response Lee!

I was able to locate all the files now. To extract the perirhinal cortex
from rh.BA_exvivo.annot, would I just use mri_annotation2label command?



On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Lee Tirrell <ltirr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
wrote:

> Hi Priyanka,
>
> The cortical labels are exactly the same for wmparc.mgz and the
> aparc+aseg.mgz, they just differ in how they label the subcortical
> structures and white matter. It should matter which you use for masking the
> cortex.
>
> The "_exvivo" in the label names is new to the dev version of Freesurfer,
> I previously answered your question based on the output from Freesurfer
> 5.3.  I looked at a subject processed with dev, and it seems there are are
> ?h.perirhinal_exvivo.label files in the label directory and a
> ?h.BA_exvivo.stats file in the stats directory. The perirhinal cortex
> should also be included in the ?h.BA_exvivo.annot files.
>
> If the stats file is missing, you can extact them from the
> ?h.BA_exvivo.annot files using the following commands:
>
> cd $SUBJECTS_DIR/subject_name/label
> mris_anatomical_stats -mgz -f ../stats/lh.BA_exvivo.stats -b -a
> ./lh.BA_exvivo.annot -c ./BA_exvivo.ctab subject_name lh white
> mris_anatomical_stats -mgz -f ../stats/rh.BA_exvivo.stats -b -a
> ./rh.BA_exvivo.annot -c ./BA_exvivo.ctab subject_name rh white
>
> Also, if this doesn't work, I can send you the perirhinal label from
> fsaverage, and you can map this to your subject using mri_label2label.
>
> Best,
> Lee
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Priyanka Mehta wrote:
>
> Correction in the previous message: I need to mask the functional images
>> (EPI) for further analysis.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Priyanka Mehta <
>> priyankamehta0...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>       Thank you for the explanation Lee.
>> I need to use the cortical labels for masking the T1 for further
>> analysis. Which file should I be using then - wmparc.mgz or aparc+aseg.mgz?
>>
>> For the perirhinal cortex, I do not have the following files even after
>> running recon-all
>> <subject>/label/lh.BA.annot
>> <subject>/label/rh.BA.annot
>>
>> <subject>/stats/lh.BA.stats
>> <subject>/stats/rh.BA.stats
>>
>> Instead I have these files (The .stats files are missing):
>> <subject>/label/lh.BA_exvivo.annot
>> <subject>/label/rh.BA_exvivo.annot
>>
>> Your help is greatly appreciated!
>>
>> Priyanka Mehta
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Lee Tirrell <
>> ltirr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>       Hi Priyanka,
>>
>>       The cortical labels are the same for wmparc.mgz and aparc+aseg.mgz
>> (taken from the ?h.aparc.annot files), but they differ on the way the white
>> matter is labeled. The aparc+aseg uses the white matter and subcortical
>>       labels from the aseg.mgz, while the wmparc labels each point in the
>> white matter as the nearest cortical label to that point, as well as the
>> subcortical labels from the aseg.
>>
>>       The perirhinal cortex isn't included in the aparc, so it isn't in
>> either of these mgz files.  However, it is included in the Brodmann area
>> annotation files, and stats are computed for this region automatically when
>>       you run recon-all:
>>
>>       <subject>/label/lh.BA.annot
>>       <subject>/label/rh.BA.annot
>>
>>       <subject>/stats/lh.BA.stats
>>       <subject>/stats/rh.BA.stats
>>
>>
>>       To see this on the inflated left hemisphere, for example, you can
>> run:
>>
>>       freeview -f subject/surf/lh.inflated:annot=subject/label/lh.BA.annot
>>
>>       Best,
>>       Lee
>>
>>
>>       On Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Priyanka Mehta wrote:
>>
>>             Hi Lee
>>
>>             Thank you for your response.
>>             I have a follow up question- After running recon-all -all, I
>> found the parahippocampal cortex and entorhinal cortex under two files-
>> wmparc.mgz and aparc+ages.mgz. What is the difference between the two?
>>             Also, I haven't been able to find perirhinal cortex under any
>> of the files. I wonder why?
>>
>>
>>
>>             On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Lee Tirrell <
>> ltirr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>                   Hi Priyanka,
>>
>>                   These are all automatically created automatically by
>> running recon-all -all.
>>
>>                   Best,
>>                   Lee
>>
>>                   On Sat, 1 Aug 2015, Priyanka Mehta wrote:
>>
>>                         Hi
>>                         Please excuse my extremely basic question.
>>
>>                         I would like to perform segmentation on my T1
>> image to obtain the following:
>>
>>                         a. Entorhinal Cortex
>>
>>                         b. Perirhinal Cortex
>>
>>                         c. Parahippocampal Cortex
>>
>>                         Is there a specific command I should be using in
>> the 6.0 dev version? Or should I just be using recon-all -all ?
>>
>>                         Best,
>>                         Priyanka Mehta
>>
>>
>>
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             Freesurfer mailing list
>>             Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>             https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>>             The information in this e-mail is intended only for the
>> person to whom it is
>>             addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in
>> error and the e-mail
>>             contains patient information, please contact the Partners
>> Compliance HelpLine at
>>             http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was
>> sent to you in error
>>             but does not contain patient information, please contact the
>> sender and properly
>>             dispose of the e-mail.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
>> is
>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
>> e-mail
>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
>> HelpLine at
>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
>> in error
>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
>> properly
>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to