Hi,
I would sum up the set of labels you have in (2) if you want the best estimate of ventricular volume.

See the following page for additional info on the various measures:

In particular, I would expect your measure in (2) would be much more correlated with BrainSegVol - BrainSegVolNotVent than eTIV - BrainSegVolNotVent
Indeed, the only difference according to the above wiki page between (2) and  BrainSegVol - BrainSegVolNotVent should be that the latter includes voxels labelled as "CSF" in the aparc+aseg.mgz

cheers,
-MH


-- 
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid Ave. Tel: 314-747-6173
St. Louis, MO  63110 Email: mha...@wustl.edu

From: Mayer Kristina <kristina.ma...@kispi.uzh.ch>
Reply-To: 'Freesurfer support list' <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Date: Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:23 AM
To: "freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" <freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>, 'Freesurfer support list' <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: [Freesurfer] ventricular CSF volumes

 

Dear Freesurfers,

I am calculatig with ventricular volumes in aseg.stats.

1. According to the archives Mail calculation of ventricular CSF is is instructed differently:

- Bruce Fischl 2007 to Jenifer: Add ventricular volumes including CSF (segid 24): Left Lateral Ventricle (segid 4) + Left Inferior Lateral Ventricle (segid 5) + Right lateral Ventricle (segid 43) + Right Inf Lateral Ventricle (segid 44) + 3rd Ventricle (segid 14) + 4th Ventricle (segid 15) + 5th Ventricle (segid 72) + CSF (segid 24)

- Bruce Fischl 2007 to Nayoung and 2014: Add choroids plexus to sum of ventricular volumes, but exclude CSF as in T1 weighted images the CSF cannot be distinguished from bone and would represent sulcal CSF (not ventricular), anyway.

 

>> Which volumes (which segid’s?) shall I include for the total ventricular CSF?

 

2. When I add up following volumes for ventricular CSF: Left Lateral Ventricle (segid 4) + Left Inferior Lateral Ventricle (segid 5) + Right lateral Ventricle (segid 43) + Right Inf Lateral Ventricle (segid 44) + 3rd Ventricle (segid 14) + 4th Ventricle (segid 15) + 5th Ventricle (segid 72) + Right choroids plexus (63) + left choroids plexus (31)

and then correlate with the following calculated volume: eTIV – BrainSegVolNotVent

the correlation is highly significant (p<0.000) but with a correlation of only r=0.66 (n=47)

 

>> Why are the volumes not the same? Which volumes are the reason for the discrepancy.

 

thanks for advice!

 

Cheers, Kristina

 


The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to