Hi Michael

I usually check visually to see if things worked. Failures occur if you dno't cut all the way through. For example, if you are cutting down the fundus of the calcarine but miss a spot so that there is a connection from upper to lower bank. You could cut down the lateral surface instead if you want to analyze visual cortex. If you load the flat map in tksurfer you can tell it's correct if the sulci all look about the same size (which means there is relatively little distortion)

cheers
Bruce


On Mon, 11 May 2015, Michael Waskom wrote:

Hi Bruce,
Is there some way to know when cuts have been made correctly so that
distortion can be minimized? (Or conversely, some way to know when a given
patch has or will undergo "too much" distortion during flattening?

Thanks!
Michael

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
wrote:
      Hi Sarah

      the unfolding tries very hard to preserve exactly this - the
      metric properties. If you cut off the occipital third of cortex
      and flatten it (after introducing some cut along the axis of the
      "cone") you should be able to get to around 10% distortion or
      below, which I assume is good enough.

      cheers
      Bruce


      On Mon, 11 May 2015, Sarah Finnegan wrote:

            Dear all,
            I am looking to take two measures within the visual
            cortex.
            1) A measure of width and length for each activation
            cluster overlaid onto
            the flattened cortical surface.
            2) A measure of spacing between each cluster 

            I can find how to take measures of area but I
            specifically want to know the
            width and length separately to correlate this to
            potential stripe systems. 
            My plan was to fit an oval to each of these clusters
            and measure length
            through the cardinal axis and width through the
            minor, spacing would be
            calculated from a line fit to the minor axis of each
            cluster. Unfortunately
            I think the unfolding process will have changed the
            spacing relationships
            between clusters to make this inappropriate. 

            I wonder if there is a command or established
            pipeline to take such
            measures?  

            Thanks for your help!
            Sarah 


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender
and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to