Sadly, no.

On 04/30/2015 04:05 AM, Alain Imaging wrote:
> Hi Douglas,
> indeed reading more carefully the documentation page of mri_mcsim I 
> figured it out. But thank for confirming it!
> Is there any rule (or also rule of thumb) for choosing the 
> cluster-forming threshold ?
>
> A.
>
> > Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:38:00 -0400
> > From: gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_mcsim with different threshold
> >
> > When you refer to a threshold of p=.1 are you talking about the
> > cluster-forming threshold or the final p-value corrected for multiple
> > comparisons? The value set when running mri_mcsim is the 
> cluster-forming
> > threshold
> >
> > On 04/29/2015 06:12 AM, Alain Imaging wrote:
> > > Hi everybody!
> > >
> > > I am running group analysis on the vertex-wise correlation between a
> > > behavioral variable and cortical thickness.
> > > I run a mri_glmfit using a specific label including only certain
> > > region in the frontal cortex, and I have the uncorrected values for
> > > the correlation. Now, if I understood correctly, I will need to run
> > > mri_mcsim to perform the cluster-based correction for multiple
> > > comparison within this label. To do so I will use mri_mcsim. My
> > > problem is that indeed I will need to know the corresponding 
> threshold
> > > to p = 0.1, as I need to show that an association between my
> > > behavioral variable and thickness in the label is NOT present, 
> even at
> > > liberal thresold. However, mcsim seems to only calculate threshold 
> for
> > > a subset of p value, and looking in the help, it seems that there is
> > > no way of overcome this behavior.
> > > Is there another way to obtain the correct threshold value for p =.1 ?
> > >
> > > Thanks in adance
> > >
> > > A.
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Freesurfer mailing list
> > > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >
> > --
> > Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
> > MGH-NMR Center
> > gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > Phone Number: 617-724-2358
> > Fax: 617-726-7422
> >
> > Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
> > FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
> > www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
> > Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freesurfer mailing list
> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >
> >
> > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to 
> whom it is
> > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and 
> the e-mail
> > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance 
> HelpLine at
> > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to 
> you in error
> > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender 
> and properly
> > dispose of the e-mail.
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

-- 
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to