I have a quick question about FreeSurfer: is cortical volume the product of cortical thickness and cortical surface are? Conceptually I assume that to be the case, and I found several papers to support that. However, when I tried it with my own data, that seems to disagree with ~12% error.
So I took a deeper look from your website and use the data from your following page as a test: https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/AnatomicalROI_tktools (#StructName/ SurfArea/ GrayVol/ ThickAvg/ Surface*Thick) (bankssts/ 1133/ 2693/ 2.331/ 2641) (caudalanteriorcingulate/ 805/ 2396/ 2.657/ 2139) (caudalmiddlefrontal/ 2205/ 6275/ 2.528/ 5574) (cuneus/ 1597/ 3129/ 1.806/ 2884) (entorhinal/ 403/ 1837/ 3.268/ 1327) The above results are took directly from your website and the last column is the product of the surface are and thickness (calculated by me), Theoretically the Gray volume should agree with the product of surface area and the thickness. However, the results above showed about 10.8% error. So I was wondering is my hypothesis of "cortical volume is the product of cortical surface area and cortical thickness" wrong or am I missing something here? What should the relationship be between cortical surface area, cortical thickness, and cortical volume? _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
