No, sorry. You might be able to treat two consecutive trials as a single trial, but then you won't get jitter between them. doug
On 12/10/2013 02:38 PM, Chris McNorgan wrote: > Hi all, > > I posed a question back in November but got no replies, so I'll try to > restate it briefly: > > Is there a means of enforcing at least one set of consecutive trials for > a condition in an optseq schedule (or even consecutive trials with an > intervening NULL event)? > > I am trying to produce a schedule for a 1-back task, and consecutive > events for a given condition will only appear by chance. Getting at > least one set of consecutive trials for each of 8 conditions has proven > exceedingly difficult. > > Thanks, > Chris > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > -- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422 Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/ _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
