Dear FS-Experts, I would like to compare 2 Groups (Responder (N=19) vs. Non-Responder (N=11)) with longitudinal data. Participants from both groups had only 2 scan sessions in each case 10 weeks apart.
So far is used the glmfit-variant with --paired-diff option in the first place. (based on http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/PairedAnalysis) The paired-fsgd contained then 2 classes (Responder, Non-Responder) which is used in glm-fit for comparison with the contrast (1 -1) for group diffs. This approach confirmed our hypothesized effects but I'm not sure whether I used the right strategy. Could you might help me with this issue? Thank in advance Best, Vivian _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
