Hi Celine, use mri_glmfit with the --pvr option (pvr = per-vertex regressor)
doug


On 10/30/2013 10:20 AM, cel...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
> Hi freesurfer team,
> I am wondering if there would be a way to process a glm analysis between 2
> surfaces from different modalities within one group of subjects.
>
> For example, within one population of patients, we would like to see if
> there is a spatial relationship between cortical thickness and another
> metrics (DTI metrics for example). What we have done so far is compute the
> mean cortical thickness for each parcellation, the mean FA for each
> parcellation, and we did a linear regression with all the subjects of our
> group.
> Would there be a way to do that at the vertex level instead of a whole
> region level? From what I understood, when we use glmfit, the regressors
> that we can put are single values like age, group, cognitive testing etc,
> but maybe not an entire surface?
> Thanks a lot
>
>
> Best,
> Celine
>

-- 
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to