HI all,

We had submitted a paper based on cortical thickness analysis in Qdec. The
reviewer's had couple concerns regarding the QDec analysis. We would
appreciate your help to address/resolve those issues. Here are the concerns:

(1) What was the rationale of using 10mm smoothing? The typical fMRI values
for volumteric work is 2-3 x the original voxel size. What's the reason for
this value?

Our response so far: A smoothing kernel of 10 mm was chosen because this
setting had been published recently in articles that performed similar
analyses.  10 mm therefore was a typical parameter for this type of
analysis.  This setting was also the default in the QDEC GUI, also
suggesting that it was a typical setting.  We only performed analyses of
the data for this project using this setting and did not iteratively test
multiple kernel widths.  Also, the FWHM for cortical thickness analyses is
somewhat larger than that used in fMRI analyses because it is applied to
surface, as opposed to volume-based data.  Surface based data are not prone
to the same artifacts of including white matter, csf or brain tissue on the
other side of a sulcus as volume-based data are.

(2) What's the p-value to get in for a cluster-wise analysis and what size
is a significant cluster? It's important to know these non cluster-wise
values to get a sense of the parameters that determine significance.

Our response so far: QDEC does not have a parameter that can be adjusted
for cluster size or extent as other whole brain analyses such as
Statistical Parametric Mapping do.  The researcher can only indicate a
statistical cutoff.  We used a p value cutoff of 0.05 after a correction
for multiple comparisons that was based on the Monte Carlo permutation
cluster analysis with 10,000 iterations. Additionally, our findings
comprise of pretty large clusters. This obviates the reason for
cluster-thresholding  based on size.


Thanks in advance for the response.
Binod
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to