Dear Anastasia,

The T1 images were acquired in a sagittal orientation, and the DTI images
in an axial orientation.
Does this help ?

Thanks

Rotem

2013/6/25 Anastasia Yendiki <ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>

>
> Hi Rotem - No problem. Were these scans by any chance acquired with a
> coronal slice prescription? In the axial views that you sent, the artifact
> that you're pointing to looks like misalignment between consecutive coronal
> slices, which could be due to head motion.
>
> a.y
>
>
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2013, Rotem Saar wrote:
>
>  Dear Anastasia,
>>
>> I tried several times to upload these images in a non-compressed way, but
>> they were too big and my posts were rejected, with no opportunity for any
>> other upload way.
>> Is there any other way for me to upload it so that everyone can see it ?
>>
>> Attached are the images in a non-compressed fashion. I will be very happy
>> if
>> u will have a look, and post your answer to me and the list to save some
>> time, until I will be able to consider another way to upload them.
>>
>> I know that we should write to all the list, but at the moment if the
>> images
>> are not visible this won't help - so I will really appreciate if u will
>> have
>> a look but also tell me what is the best way to upload them so that all
>> list
>> members will be able to see them.
>>
>> Thank u very much for your help.
>>
>> Rotem
>>
>> 2013/6/25 Anastasia Yendiki <ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>
>>       Sorry, can't open the image.
>>
>>       On Sun, 23 Jun 2013, Rotem Saar wrote:
>>
>>             Hi there,
>>
>>             Long time:). Well I wrote to the list several times
>>             regarding high FA values
>>             I got when performing DTI analysis.
>>             Today we know that the problem was an additional
>>             direction (we had 17
>>             directions instead of 16 - we used a Philips
>>             scanner,1.5T). So we deleted
>>             the additional slices and the high values indeed
>>             disappeared, but then
>>             another problem came up (tried several subjects so
>>             the problem is not
>>             specific to a subject) -
>>
>>             I noticed an artifact that I can't explain - please
>>             see the attached
>>             pictures.
>>
>>             This artifact existed even before I deleted the
>>             additional slices, also - I
>>             see the artifact also when loading the masked
>>             volume...It is cyclic - run
>>             over all slices...
>>
>>             any ideas ?
>>
>>             I'm using version 5.2 and I know the command lines
>>             are correct (send it to u
>>             in the past).
>>
>>             Thanks for your help
>>
>>             Rotem
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
>> it is
>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
>> e-mail
>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
>> HelpLine at
>> http://www.partners.org/**complianceline<http://www.partners.org/complianceline>.
>>  If the e-mail was sent to you
>> in error
>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender
>> and properly
>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>
>>
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to