Hi Mike
the 3.5-4mm thickness probably makes them not usable since it means
opposing banks of a sulcus will be in the same voxel pretty frequently
sorry
Bruce
On
Mon, 24 Jun 2013, Michael Kranz wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having trouble determining whether or not to use our T2 images for the
new pial refinement feature. Most importantly, I'm wondering if our T2 image
parameters are sufficient for the T2 pial refinement. The parameters of our
T2 images are as follows:
T2 TSE overlay with a voxel size of 1.1x1.1x3.5 mm (slice thickness).
A couple other studies in our lab have a voxel size of 0.9x0.9x4.0 mm.
Note that our MPRAGE voxel size is .9x.9x.9mm.
In your release notes, it states we should uaround a 1x1x1mm (let me know if
you need additional specifications such as geometry bandwidth etc):
"T2/FLAIR used for pial surface refinement: if you have T2 or FLAIR scans
~1mm^3, then they can be used by the recon-all stream to refine the pial
surfaces".
I have experienced about 1/4 of our subjects with errors using the T2 pial
flag. As a next step, if you think the parameters are acceptable, then I can
send you some screen shots different errors that I have encountered wit
these subjects.
Best,
Mike
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
