Does the beta permit volumes bigger than 256^3 voxels? just asking....and
just asking about raw dimensions in unit-voxels at the start of pipeline

cheers

Colin

On 18 January 2013 17:00, <freesurfer-requ...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:

> Send Freesurfer mailing list submissions to
>         freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         freesurfer-requ...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         freesurfer-ow...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Freesurfer digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. v5.2.0 beta, round two (Nick Schmansky)
>    2. Re: pial not computing (Borzello, Mia)
>    3. Re: pial not computing (Bruce Fischl)
>    4. Re: FW:  longitudinal analysis (Alex Hanganu)
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Nick Schmansky <ni...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> To: <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Cc:
> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:20:43 -0500
> Subject: [Freesurfer] v5.2.0 beta, round two
> For those willing and brave enough, another beta of v5.2.0 has been posted
> here for you to download and test:
>
> ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/dist/freesurfer/5.2.0-BETA/
>
> The Mac builds should work (note: the lion build is 64b, snow-leopard is
> 32b).
>
> The final release still awaits some critical improvements to the Tracula
> stream, but the main recon-all stream with this beta is final.  The final
> release is expected the first week of February.
>
> Freesurfer team
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Borzello, Mia" <mborze...@partners.org>
> To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Cc:
> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:25:40 +0000
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] pial not computing
> great. is there a freesurfer page on mris_topo_fixer? I'm not sure
> how/where to run this and I don't see a page on the freesurfer site.
>
> Thanks so much,
> m
> ________________________________________
> From: Bruce Fischl [fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 1:30 PM
> To: Borzello, Mia
> Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] pial not computing
>
> Hi Mia
>
> this is fixed in the newest version. You can grab a new mris_topo_fixer
> and you rerun and it should be all set. You probably should take a look
> at the ?h.orig.nofix to make sure it's reasonable (meaning no cerebellum
> or skull attached, and the hemispherees successfully separated)
>
> cheers
> Bruce
> On Thu, 17
> Jan 2013, Borzello, Mia wrote:
>
> > Okay, so it didn't complete without error. I've attached the
> recon-all.log. Also, I was using another post op patient's MRI scans.
> >
> > thanks so much,
> > m
> > ________________________________________
> > From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [
> freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] on behalf of Bruce Fischl [
> fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 11:22 AM
> > To: Borzello, Mia
> > Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] pial not computing
> >
> > Hi Mia
> >
> > we need to see the recon-all.log. Did it end with an error?
> > Bruce
> > On Thu, 17 Jan
> > 2013, Borzello, Mia wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Freesurfers,
> >>
> >> I just ran a recon, and it seems that only  the lh.pial computed, but
> not the rh.pial. What would be the cause of this?
> >> Thanks,
> >> m
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Freesurfer mailing list
> >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freesurfer mailing list
> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> To: "Borzello, Mia" <mborze...@partners.org>
> Cc: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:28:00 -0500
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] pial not computing
> it's run as part of recon-all. If you grab a new one and run
>
> recon-all -make all ...
>
> you should be all set
> Bruce
>
>
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, Borzello, Mia wrote:
>
>  great. is there a freesurfer page on mris_topo_fixer? I'm not sure
>> how/where to run this and I don't see a page on the freesurfer site.
>>
>> Thanks so much,
>> m
>> ______________________________**__________
>> From: Bruce Fischl [fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 1:30 PM
>> To: Borzello, Mia
>> Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] pial not computing
>>
>> Hi Mia
>>
>> this is fixed in the newest version. You can grab a new mris_topo_fixer
>> and you rerun and it should be all set. You probably should take a look
>> at the ?h.orig.nofix to make sure it's reasonable (meaning no cerebellum
>> or skull attached, and the hemispherees successfully separated)
>>
>> cheers
>> Bruce
>> On Thu, 17
>> Jan 2013, Borzello, Mia wrote:
>>
>>  Okay, so it didn't complete without error. I've attached the
>>> recon-all.log. Also, I was using another post op patient's MRI scans.
>>>
>>> thanks so much,
>>> m
>>> ______________________________**__________
>>> From: 
>>> freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.**harvard.edu<freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>[
>>> freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.**harvard.edu<freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>]
>>> on behalf of Bruce Fischl [fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 11:22 AM
>>> To: Borzello, Mia
>>> Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] pial not computing
>>>
>>> Hi Mia
>>>
>>> we need to see the recon-all.log. Did it end with an error?
>>> Bruce
>>> On Thu, 17 Jan
>>> 2013, Borzello, Mia wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi Freesurfers,
>>>>
>>>> I just ran a recon, and it seems that only  the lh.pial computed, but
>>>> not the rh.pial. What would be the cause of this?
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> m
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.**edu/mailman/listinfo/**freesurfer<https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  ______________________________**_________________
>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.**edu/mailman/listinfo/**freesurfer<https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer>
>>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.**edu/mailman/listinfo/**freesurfer<https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Alex Hanganu <al.hang...@yahoo.ca>
> To: FS Mailing List <Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Cc:
> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:39:31 -0500
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] FW: longitudinal analysis
>  Hi Paul,
>
> I also had such problems previously. My initial analyses were performed on
> mac. Though it might seem strange, some analyses resolved after I just
> restarted the computer. Other ones I analysed on centos. Now I am doing all
> the recons on linux.
>
> best wishes,
>
> Alex.
>
>
>
> Le 1/18 9:22, paul horton a écrit :
>
>
>
> > Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 08:54:48 -0500
> > From: fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > To: horton_p...@hotmail.com
> > Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] longitudinal analysis
> >
> > Hi Paul
> >
> > can you cc the list so that others can answer?
> >
> > thanks
> > Bruce
> > On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, paul
> > horton wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Brian,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your reply.
> > >
> > > I am running freesurfer 4.5.0.  We are using the older version so that
> the
> > > analyses performed are the same across subjects.
> > >
> > > Best wishes
> > >
> > > Paul
> > >
> > > Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 08:21:05 -0500
> > > From: fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > > To: horton_p...@hotmail.com
> > > CC: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] longitudinal analysis
> > >
> > > Hi Paul
> > >
> > > what is the actual binary being run?
> > >
> > > Bruce
> > > On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, paul horton wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi guys,
> > > >
> > > > I am currently running a longitudinal analysis on a set of scan.  It
> is
> > > > currently running and so far it has taken 5 days. It seems to be
> taking a
> > > > large amount of time on a process called labelling slice. I have run
> the
> > > > same analysis on other subjects which took about 6 hours to
> complete.  So
> > > I
> > > > was wondering if you know of any reason why a set of scans would
> take long
> > > er
> > > > to process than others.  I have checked the inital scans and nothing
> seems
> > > > obviously wrong with them.
> > > >
> > > > Best Wishes
> > > >
> > > > Paul
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list
> > > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The
> information
> > > in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. If
> > > you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
> contains
> > > patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
> > > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to
> you in
> > > error but does not contain patient information, please contact the
> sender
> > > and properly dispose of the e-mail.
> > >
> > >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing 
> listfreesur...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine 
> athttp://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to