Hi Paul,

also, is this happening in the -base run or in one of the -long runs (or in all of the -long runs of that subject). What binary is running so slowly (you mentioned some output "labelling slice", can you scroll up in the log and see what exactly is running)?

Best, Martin

On 01/18/2013 02:46 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
how much RAM do you have in the machine? And are there other processes running at the same time? How many timepoints does the subject have?

Bruce

On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, paul horton wrote:

Hi Alex,

Thanks for your reply.

I am also using Linux. I have restarted the analysis a few times but the
process for this particular subject is very slow. When I try the same
analysis on a different subject using the same machine, it only takes a few hours. So not sure why the analysis is having problems with this particular
subject.

Best wishes

Paul

On 18 Jan 2013, at 16:40, "Alex Hanganu" <al.hang...@yahoo.ca> wrote:

      Hi Paul,

      I also had such problems previously. My initial analyses were
      performed on mac. Though it might seem strange, some analyses
      resolved after I just restarted the computer. Other ones I
      analysed on centos. Now I am doing all the recons on linux.

      best wishes,

      Alex.



      Le 1/18 9:22, paul horton a écrit :


      > Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 08:54:48 -0500
      > From: fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
      > To: horton_p...@hotmail.com
      > Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] longitudinal analysis
      >
      > Hi Paul
      >
      > can you cc the list so that others can answer?
      >
      > thanks
      > Bruce
      > On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, paul
      > horton wrote:
      >
      > > Hi Brian,
      > >
      > > Thanks for your reply.
      > >
      > > I am running freesurfer 4.5.0.  We are using the older
      version so that the
      > > analyses performed are the same across subjects.
      > >
      > > Best wishes
      > >
      > > Paul
      > >
      > > Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 08:21:05 -0500
      > > From: fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
      > > To: horton_p...@hotmail.com
      > > CC: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
      > > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] longitudinal analysis
      > >
      > > Hi Paul
      > >
      > > what is the actual binary being run?
      > >
      > > Bruce
      > > On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, paul horton wrote:
      > >
      > > > Hi guys,
      > > >
      > > > I am currently running a longitudinal analysis on a
      set of scan.  It is
      > > > currently running and so far it has taken 5 days. It
      seems to be taking a
      > > > large amount of time on a process called labelling
      slice. I have run the
      > > > same analysis on other subjects which took about 6
      hours to complete.  So
      > > I
      > > > was wondering if you know of any reason why a set of
      scans would take long
      > > er
      > > > to process than others.  I have checked the inital
      scans and nothing seems
      > > > obviously wrong with them.
      > > >
      > > > Best Wishes
      > > >
      > > > Paul
      > > >
      > > >
      > >
      > > _______________________________________________
      Freesurfer mailing list
      > > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
      > >
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
      The information
      > > in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
      it is addressed. If
      > > you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and
      the e-mail contains
      > > patient information, please contact the Partners
      Compliance HelpLine at
      > > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail
      was sent to you in
      > > error but does not contain patient information, please
      contact the sender
      > > and properly dispose of the e-mail.
      > >
      > >


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mai
l
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLin
e at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in er
ror
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and prop
erly
dispose of the e-mail.


      _______________________________________________
      Freesurfer mailing list
      Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


      The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person
      to whom it is
      addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error
      and the e-mail
      contains patient information, please contact the Partners
      Compliance HelpLine at
      http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent
      to you in error
      but does not contain patient information, please contact the
      sender and properly
      dispose of the e-mail.





_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to