yes, that would retain edits cheers Bruce On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Catherine Bois wrote:
> Ps. To make it clearer; would this command recon-all -autorecon1 -autorecon2 > -autorecon3, incorporate all the edits amde, or would it merely overwrite > them and just regenerate the brain surface from scratch? > > Thanks > > On 26 November 2012 13:13, Catherine Bois <clb...@york.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently in the process of reconstructing my brains after > performing edits. I am submitting them to a system named condor, > which allows them to be processed in parallel, reducing time. > However, I am unsure of how to best use the script that takes > into account all the changes made. Is it possible to submit the > same script for all (even though different changes have been > made to each brain), as long as the command specifying the > change occurs earlier in the process than for example the > changes made to a certain brain (hope that makes sense). Is this > correct? However, I have also heard from someone tha tif you > make white matter edits you should only run the reconstruction > process at the steps AFTER the white matter mask is created; is > this correct? As this is contradictory to what I thought; I > thought that you start with your edits that are "earlist in the > process"; ie do that step again and then it takes into account > subsequent edits? > > Thanks for your help, sorry for the confusing question. > > Cathy > > > > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
