Dear Freesurfers, We've been comparing 2 different methods to obtain CT averages for 4 Volume ROI-s (volume ROI-s were in Colin27 space). We've used the 40 buckner subjects for the comparisons.
METHOD L2L: bbregister >> mri_vol2surf (mgh) >> mri_binarize (mgh) >> mri_cor2label (label) >> mri_label2label >> mris_anatomical_stats METHOD S2S: bbregister >> mri_vol2surf >> mri_preproc (mri_surf2surf) >> mri_segstats After performing t-test-s over the results, we can observe that the results are in many cases different. -- Is there a way to choose the "best" method? Which one should we use for our work and why? Many thanks again for your help, Gari PD We've tabulated a third method as well: METHOD SurfRend: Surfrend (.w) >> mri_surf2surf(.mgh) >> mri_binarize(.mgh) >> mri_cor2label (.label) >> mris_anatomical_stats _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
