Hi Martin
I don't think the thickness stuff has changed substantially since then
unless you are doing a longitudinal study, so you should be ok
cheers
Bruce
On Fri, 16
Mar 2012, Martin Lan wrote:
Hello,
I am planning to do an analysis of cortical thickness, comparing a group of
brain samples from patients to those of healthy control subjects. The
laboratory that I am working in has freesurfer 4.5.0 loaded on our
hardware. With our system, it would be labor intensive to load an updated
version of freesurfer. My question is whether there would be significant
disadvantages to using the 4.5.0 version for this function over the 5.1.0.
Particularly, should we anticipate criticisms of reviewers of future
manuscripts because of the use of the older version?
Thank you in advance for your help,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
