Alright, thanks. Would you recommend against using the new longitudinal stream with data generated from a previous version though? That is my main question.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>wrote: > no, there are other differences as well. > > Bruce > > On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Erica Griffith wrote: > > Hi all, >> >> Does anyone have experience running a longitudinal analysis in version >> 5.0, >> using .mgz files generated from the last version of freesurfer? My >> understanding is that the only major differences between the previous and >> current versions were in the longitudinal stream. Any input would be >> appreciated! Thanks. >> >> >> > > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it > is > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the > e-mail > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance > HelpLine at > http://www.partners.org/**complianceline<http://www.partners.org/complianceline>. > If the e-mail was sent to you in error > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and > properly > dispose of the e-mail. > >
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
