Hi Doug,
So I did the additional smoothing and the map looks better..  It's  
still hard to interpret though.  I was expecting alternating red and  
blue bands to signify V1/V2/V3 boundaries, but it's very irregular  
with red curves running every which way into blue splotches.  Do you  
have any suggestions how to interpret this?

So then I just looked at the automatic parcellation of V1 and V2,  
which seems very different from the actual fieldsign results..  The  
boundaries overlap quite a bit, which seems odd.  How should I treat  
the overlap?

Thanks for your help.
Michelle


Alsouoting Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:
>
>
> Michelle Umali wrote:
>> Hi Doug,
>> I've already smoothed by 5 during preproc-sess, so does this mean I  
>>   should do additional smoothing during fieldsign-sess step?
>>
> Try the additional one now to see if it fixes the map.
>> Also, is this the correct command to use the sphere and not the patch:
>> fieldsign-sess -a rtopy.self.lh -fwhm 5 -sphere -s sj09
>>
> yes
> doug
>> Thanks.
>> Michelle
>>
>>
>> Quoting Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:
>>
>>
>>> Try smoothing (eg, -fwhm 5) when running fieldsign-sess. You can also
>>> try using the sphere instead of the occip patch.
>>> doug
>>>
>>> Michelle Umali wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Doug,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again for your advice, the heat maps look much better. However,
>>>> they still do not visualize the continuous range of angles or
>>>> eccentricities but rather divide it into two intervals such as red vs.
>>>> blue. Is there any way to adjust the color range to make it more
>>>> appropriate for this kind of data?
>>>>
>>>> The heat map for the field sign data still looks speckled. I attached
>>>> an image showing the heat maps for polar angle, eccentricity, and
>>>> field sign, with the corresponding overlay settings.
>>>>
>>>> I used 5mm smoothing.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much,
>>>> Michelle
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Quoting Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> The activation looks pretty reasonable. As you point out, the angles
>>>>> are a mess. How did you set the color scale for the angles? You should
>>>>> leave it as a heat scale (if you're using tksurfer-sess). How much did
>>>>> you smooth?
>>>>>
>>>>> doug
>>>>>
>>>>> Michelle Umali wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Doug,
>>>>>> Attached is a pic of the significance and angle maps for polar   
>>>>>> and eccen.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>> Michelle
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Quoting Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> what does the activation look like? Does it look right? Can   
>>>>>>> you   send a pic?
>>>>>>> doug
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Michelle Umali wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Doug,
>>>>>>>> The z-values are consistently near or greater than 4. It just  
>>>>>>>>     seems that the
>>>>>>>> visualization of the angles is somehow incorrect...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is there be anything else that I need to check?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>> Michelle
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>>>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>>>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
>>>>>>> MGH-NMR Center
>>>>>>> gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>>>>> Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
>>>>>>> FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person  
>>>>>>>    to   whom it is
>>>>>>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error  
>>>>>>>    and  the e-mail
>>>>>>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
>>>>>>> HelpLine at
>>>>>>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
>>>>>>> in error
>>>>>>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
>>>>>>> properly
>>>>>>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>>>>>    
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
>>>>> MGH-NMR Center
>>>>> gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>>> Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
>>>>>
>>>>> Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
>>>>> FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- End forwarded message -----
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
>>> MGH-NMR Center
>>> gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>> Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
>>>
>>> Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
>>> FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
> MGH-NMR Center
> gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
>
> Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
> FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html



_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to