Wait, I'm confused, in v 4.5 (which I'm using) the paradigm files have 4
values per line (starting time, condition, length, and weight), so don't
they have the lengths in there?  I know you could use an older paradigm file
with only 2 columns (starting time, condition), and in this case I would
list each TR and the condition there, but the wiki says that v. 4.5 can use
the 4 column paradigm files.  Is that not true?  I mean it obviously uses
the weights....

I ran an event related analysis with -noautostimdur in the analysis, with a
4 column paradigm file.  I did not list every TR, but used the 3rd column to
list the length of time.  I got what appears to be valid data out.  When I
redid it with -autostimdur, I got very little activation.  But if the
-noautostimdur assumes that each event is equal to the TR (which is shorter
than the actual durations I have), then wouldn't the analysis have had
problems because I didn't cover all the TRs in the paradigm file? But it
worked fine.

I'm very confused here.

Also, is there a difference between the way this is used in FIR and Gamma
analyses?

Katie


On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Douglas N Greve
<gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>wrote:

> FYI: autostimdur is not valid in version 5.X because the stimulus duration
> is supplied in the paradigm file. For earlier versions, there was no info in
> the par file about the duration. The -autostimdur will compute the duration
> of the stimulus from the paradigm file based upon the time to the next
> stimulus entry this works as long as all time is accounted for in the
> parfile and no stimuli overlap. If you use -no-autostimdur, then it will
> assume that the duration of the event is equal to the TR.
>
> doug
>
>
> Katie Bettencourt wrote:
>
>> I'm a bit confused about what the -autostimdur and -noautostimdur flags in
>> mkanalysis-sess do.  I've checked the help files, but the wording is a bit
>> confusing, and when I run them on my event related design, I get different
>> results depending on which flag I use, with the -noautostimdur being more of
>> what I expect as far as results go.
>>
>> Also, they are only used in event related and AB designs, not blocked,
>> correct?
>>
>> Katie
>>
>
> --
> Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
> MGH-NMR Center
> gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
>
> Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
> FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
>
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to