what did you call it?
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Nikolas Borrel-Jensen wrote:

> Thanks for the fast reply. I have uploaded the entire subject directory and
> would appreciate if you could take a look.
>
> /Nikolas
>
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Bruce Fischl 
> <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>wrote:
>
>> Hi Nikolas
>>
>> the spiked by themselves aren't a problem, it's only if the surface isn't
>> accurately following the true gray/white boundary that you need to
>> intervene. It's a bit hard to tell in this case without being able to scroll
>> back and forth, but I suspect the segmentation is a bit inaccurate in this
>> region, which results in an incorrectly fixed topological defect. If you
>> want to, you can tar and gzip the entire subject dir and ftp it for us and
>> I'll take a look.
>>
>> cheers
>> Bruce
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Nikolas Borrel-Jensen wrote:
>>
>>  Hi everybody.
>>>
>>> I have done all the auto-recon steps on my data, and I have some questions
>>> about the quality of the resulting images. I am aware of the
>>> troubleshooting
>>> tutorials, but I don't think these are covering my questions.
>>>
>>> I have uploaded some images of the surfaces and segmentations of a subject
>>> to http://freesurfer.nikolasborrel.com, and my question is about the
>>> spikes
>>> in the inflated surfaces. I have selected two spikes on the surface (green
>>> mark), one for each hemisphere, and have found the corresponding location
>>> in
>>> tkmedit in each of the three directions (s,h,c).
>>>
>>> For the spike in the left hemisphere (spike1_lh), I can't see what should
>>> be
>>> causing the spike. The segmentation looks correct.
>>>
>>> For the spike in the right hemisphere (spike_rh), it seems like there are
>>> many 'isles of segmentations, but are these causing the spike? If yes, how
>>> should these isles be corrected?
>>>
>>> Finally, how smooth is the inflated surface expected to be in a 'correct'
>>> case? Should a small amount of spikes be allowed, as long as they are not
>>> 'too severe'?
>>>
>>> I can upload more images if needed, thanks in advance!
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>> Nikolas
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
>> is
>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
>> e-mail
>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
>> HelpLine at
>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
>> error
>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
>> properly
>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to