The Something-vs-fix of the original paradigm will not relate to the 
2-v-fix of the slope test, though they should look something like the 
1-v-fix of the slope test. Have you looked at that? The 2-v-fix will 
look more like a difference in the loads from the original (eg, 7-1).

doug

Adam Nitenson wrote:
> The supposed "load regression map" that I generated did not make sense
> given the maps of the individual loads vs fix. I attached the original
> paradigm (run1.par), the slope paradigm which I tried to adapt from the
> other thread (SIRP_Run1_LoadSlopeTest.par) and an image showing the 1vfix,
> 3vfix, 5vfix, and 7vfix images from the original paradigm, as well as a
> large 2vFix image from the new paradigm, which I thought would have shown
> the within subjects regression (condition 2 being the weighted loads).
> "Desired results" was a poor description...it is more that the results do
> not seems to represent the load regression based on the individual load
> maps.
>
> -Adam
>
>
>   
>> what do you mean that you were not able to get the desired result?
>> doug
>>
>> Adam Nitenson wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi Doug and Freesurfers,
>>>
>>>      Now that I have re-processed some of my data in Stable 5, I would
>>> like to re-open a previous problem I was trying to tackle:
>>>
>>> "  We are using the Sternberg Item Recognition Paradigm in our study,
>>> which involves the memorization and recognition of groups of 1, 3, 5,
>>> and 7 letters. Each run has two sets of each condition (load). We
>>> want to determine if any regions of the brain activate in a linear
>>> pattern with increased task load (# of letters). I have already done
>>> regression analyses using genotype, but that was between subjects, while
>>> this analysis would be within subjects. Does anyone know how I could
>>> structure an analysis that would allow me to look at this?
>>> Is this something I have to do at the mkanalysis-sess level?"
>>>
>>>     I had tried doing this in Stable 4 using the method described here
>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2010-December/016557.html
>>>   However, I was unable to generate the desired results, so I decided
>>> to switch over to Stable 5 as suggested.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Adam
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>>> ---------------------------- Original Message
>>>> ----------------------------
>>>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Regression: Activation as a function of
>>>> condition
>>>> From:    "Douglas N Greve" <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>>> Date:    Tue, January 11, 2011 11:52 am
>>>> To:      "Adam Nitenson" <niten...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> You don't need to re-unpack. you don't run recon-all on the functional,
>>>> only the anatomicals.
>>>>
>>>> Adam Nitenson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> So this means I will have to start at the unpacksdcmdir command and
>>>>> then
>>>>> recon-all to rerun the functionals?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> You don't need to re-run the anatomicals, but you will need to rerun
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> functionals.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> doug
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Adam Nitenson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> Hmm...it appears that we might need to make the transition over to
>>>>>>> Stable
>>>>>>> 5 then.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would I have to reprocess all Stable 4 subjects again in Stable 5
>>>>>>> (including the whole recon-all from bourget) process, or is there
>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>> sort of jumping off point from which I can start using the new
>>>>>>> stable?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Adam
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> you can't do it in stable4, but you can  in stable 5.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> doug
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Adam Nitenson wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>> Hello Freesurfers,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>      We are using the Sternberg Item Recognition Paradigm in our
>>>>>>>>> study,
>>>>>>>>> which involves the memorization and recognition of groups of 1, 3,
>>>>>>>>> 5,
>>>>>>>>> and 7 letters. Each run has two sets of each condition (load). We
>>>>>>>>> want to determine if any regions of the brain activate in a linear
>>>>>>>>> pattern with increased task load. I have already done regression
>>>>>>>>> analyses using genotype, but that was between subjects, while this
>>>>>>>>> analysis would be within subjects. Does anyone know how I could
>>>>>>>>> structure an analysis (STABLE 4) that would allow me to look at
>>>>>>>>> this?
>>>>>>>>> Is this something I have to do at the mkanalysis-sess level?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Adam Nitenson, B.S.
>>>>>>>>> Brain Genomics Lab
>>>>>>>>> Massachusetts General Hospital
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>>>>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
>>>>>>>> MGH-NMR Center
>>>>>>>> gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>>>>>> Phone Number: 617-724-2358
>>>>>>>> Fax: 617-726-7422
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
>>>>>>>> FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> Adam Nitenson, B.S.
>>>>>>> Brain Genomics Lab
>>>>>>> Massachusetts General Hospital
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
>>>>>> MGH-NMR Center
>>>>>> gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>>>> Phone Number: 617-724-2358
>>>>>> Fax: 617-726-7422
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
>>>>>> FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>> Adam Nitenson, B.S.
>>>>> Brain Genomics Lab
>>>>> Massachusetts General Hospital
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> --
>>>> Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
>>>> MGH-NMR Center
>>>> gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>> Phone Number: 617-724-2358
>>>> Fax: 617-726-7422
>>>>
>>>> Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
>>>> FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Adam Nitenson, B.S.
>>>> Brain Genomics Lab
>>>> Massachusetts General Hospital
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> Adam Nitenson, B.S.
>>> Brain Genomics Lab
>>> Massachusetts General Hospital
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> --
>> Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
>> MGH-NMR Center
>> gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> Phone Number: 617-724-2358
>> Fax: 617-726-7422
>>
>> Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
>> FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
> Adam Nitenson, B.S.
> Brain Genomics Lab
> Massachusetts General Hospital

-- 
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358 
Fax: 617-726-7422

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to