Hi Derin, that is odd, not sure what's going on either with your wrinkles or the loss of surface after editing. Can you upload the pre and post edited datasets for us to look at? Bruce
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Derin Cobia wrote: > I have questions regarding two issues we've run into processing dementia and > age-matched healthy subjects: > > 1. For several of our subjects, we've noticed that an isolated region of the > entorhinal pial surface becomes 'indented' towards the white surface (see in > RH in attached pics- P5b*). Not sure what's going, I've tried to correct it > by removing any extraneous neighboring voxels or other 'anomalies' (no voxel > gaps in the wm volumes from lesions, etc). It almost reminds me of the > insula 'spike' a few versions back. Thoughts? > > 2. After re-running a subject for cp and wm edits, the resulting white (and > consequently pial) surface has become inaccurate for large portions of the > anterior temporal and frontal lobes, but just in the LH (attached pics- > P8b*). To clarify, this was not the case after the data's initial run, only > once edits were made and incorporated. We've run into this before, but only > after editing a subject multiple times (3-4x, thus more recons), or > 'updating' subjects to a new FS version (e.g., re-running v4.1.0 data with > v4.5.0). Are edits changing the intensity threshold? It's odd that it's > asymmetric. > > Any help/thoughts would be appreciated, thanks. > > -Derin > > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
