actually, we have a DLPFC label I think, or a couple of them drawn on fsaverageOn Sat, 12 Jun 2010 ra...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
> Hi Fatima, > > As Bruce mentioned, this is a poorly defined region. Within the PFC, what > exactly are you measuring? DLPFC or some the whole of the PFC? If you are > interested in evaluating DLPFC, my suggestion would be to manually draw it > yourself on the fsaverage (as Bruce mentioned) and map it onto every > individual subject. > > Hope this helps, > > rahul > >> Hi Fatima, >> >> it's kind of a poorly-defined region, so I'm not sure how to answer. >> Those labels don't make up all of prefrontal cortex. Maybe the easiest >> thing to do is to draw it yourself on fsaverage and map it back to all >> your >> subjects. Or maybe Rahul could answer. >> >> cheers, >> Bruce >> >> >> On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Ahmed, F, Me >> <fah...@sun.ac.za> wrote: >> >>> Sorry for repeating myself, but I'm unsure if my first post got through >>> successfully. My post is detailed below: >>> >>> I require values (total volume) for the prefrontal cortex. I see labels >>> for "G_frontal_middle" and "G_frontal_superior" in the lh.aparc.annot >>> files - are these correct to use? If so, could I add up the values for >>> these to get one total volume for the PFC? >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Fatima >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
