Hi,
I've mailed this once before and tried to solve a persistent problem.
Reviewing the results of recon-all I noticed that the derived pial
surface chopped away an unacceptable amount of gm voxels.
First of all I tried to manually edit some wm voxels, however with
no success.
Then I tried another solution by combining the FSL-FAST wm
segmentation with wm.mgz because I noticed that FSL_FAST
produced better results. Although the results did improve,
still the pial surface was incorrect.
The last option I tried was another set of parameters for
nu_correct. Because it concerns 3T scans I used
--proto-iters1000 and --distance 50 (see paper of Zheng et al,
NeuroImage 48, 73-83 (2009)) and previous e-mails on
this subject ("nu-correct parameters", 27 April 2010).
Also with these settings the pial surface chopped away
too many voxels.
I'm desperate, the manuals provide no options on how to fix
such problems. The pial surface can be corrected by only
REMOVING voxels that are included erroneously but there is
no way to extent the pial surface by ADDING voxels.
Ed
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
