Hello Nick. I'm really sorry for bothering you but I'm still waiting for your answer. :) Thank you
2010/4/6 eunkyung kim <kse...@gmail.com>: > Hello Nick. > Bruce said you can give me the latest Freesurfer version. > Actually, as I already mentioned, I have a problem with negative > cortical thickness and it bothered me very much.. > but it's fixed in the most recent version of mris_make_surfaces and > mris_thickness. > Freesurfer wiki homepage doesn't contain fixed version.. > I know you are very busy, but May I receive a fixed version from you > as soon as possible? > > Thank you. > > Sincerely, EK > > > 2010/4/2 Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>: >> Hi EK, >> >> Nick (ccd) can get you the new versions. >> >> cheers, >> Bruce >> >> On Fri, 2 Apr 2010, eunkyung kim wrote: >> >>> Hi Bruce. Thank you for your reply. >>> But I still wonder because I used the most recent version ' >>> freesurfer-Linux-centos4-stable-pub-v4.5.0'. >>> Did you mean future released version 5.0 ? >>> Please let me know right place that obtain the 'mris_make_surfaces' >>> and 'mris_thickness' files. >>> The released note page does not contain this files at now... >>> >>> >>> Sincerely, EK. >>> >>> >>> 2010/4/1 Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>: >>>> >>>> Hi EK, >>>> >>>> this was a bug I fixed a little while ago. The negative thicknesses >>>> should >>>> all be in non-cortical regions, but it's fixed in the most recent version >>>> of >>>> mris_make_surfaces and mris_thickness. The negative value should all be 0 >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> Bruce >>>> >>>> On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, eunkyung kim wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear all >>>>> I performed recon-all -s subjectID -qcache and obtained thickness data >>>>> which was normalized to fsaverage template. >>>>> I'd like to extract thickness value of the '-rh(or >>>>> lh).thickness.fwhm0.fsaverage.mgh' file in each subjects, so it was >>>>> transformed to the ascii file format. >>>>> However, the thickness data obtained from the ascii file did have some >>>>> negative values. !!! >>>>> Interestingly, the thickness value that was not normalized to the >>>>> fsaverage did not have negative values so I was very confused.. >>>>> Please let me know how can I treat the negative value. >>>>> >>>>> I really THANK YOU for your reply. >>>>> >>>>> Sincerely, EK. >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Freesurfer mailing list >>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is >> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the >> e-mail >> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance >> HelpLine at >> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in >> error >> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and >> properly >> dispose of the e-mail. >> >> > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
