Thanks Donna for the explanation of my confusion.  

I am wondering if there is any way I could make use of the Freesurfer
registration and then get things into Caret where I could do what I want?
For example, is there any way, given a registered and unregistered sphere of
a given subject that we can figure out what the deformation map was?  

If the above is not possible, is it possible to do the following in
FreeSurfer?  What I really need to be able to do is map some scalers/metrics
from volume to white surface, then map from white surface to registered
sphere, visualize them on a standard inflated surface (hopefully after
averaging the scaler/metrics across several subjects) and draw some
labels/paints, then map the labels/paints from the standard surface back to
the individual white surface, and from the individual white surface back to
the volume.  

Thanks for everyone's help!

Matt. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Donna Dierker [mailto:do...@brainvis.wustl.edu] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 1:26 PM
To: m...@ma-tea.com
Cc: 'Bruce Fischl'; 'Douglas N Greve'; freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Application of Default Surface Based Registration
to Surfaces Other than the Sphere

Matt,

I think we just do things differently.  We adopted Ziad Saad's concept 
of a standard mesh.  (Before Ziad conceived it, we didn't do this, 
either.)  But not everyone does this.  My mental model of how others do 
things is poor.  I recall using mrisp_paint to get some scalars on our 
PALS surfaces several years ago, with Bruce's help, but I didn't 
understand what I was doing.

One thing to realize is that usually people are interested in scalars 
associated with the surfaces (e.g., thickness, depth, fMRI intensities), 
rather than the surfaces themselves.  I think you need the surfaces for 
your tractography stuff.

But if all you need is average metric data on average40, then I doubt 
you need the individual surfaces on a standard mesh.

Donna

On 03/02/2010 12:58 PM, Matt Glasser wrote:
> Hi Doug and Bruce,
>
> I am somewhat surprised by your responses, given that we do what I need
done
> with Caret all the time.  I wonder if I am not explaining myself clearly
or
> not understanding your responses (Donna, perhaps you can help?).  In
Caret,
> one does a landmark-based registration of the sphere and generates a
> deformation map that is applied to all the other surfaces.  Are you saying
> that there is no similar way to get a deformation map and apply it to the
> other surfaces?  
>
> I am just hoping to use the FreeSurfer registration because it is a little
> more automated than the Caret registration.  
>
> The end result is that I want to average some metric data from the volumes
> on the average surface.
>
> Thanks and sorry for my lack of understanding,
>
> Matt.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 12:38 PM
> To: Douglas N Greve
> Cc: m...@ma-tea.com; freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Application of Default Surface Based
Registration
> to Surfaces Other than the Sphere
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> you could use mri_surf2surf to map the fsaverage surface to any subject. 
> We always avoid doing this as we want uniform sampling in the subject's 
> space, and were willing to make the engineering more difficult to preserve

> this.
>
> cheers
> Bruce
>
>
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Douglas N Greve wrote:
>
>   
>> Oh, that's not such an easy thing to do. We can only map values from one
>> subject to another. I know what you are describing, and it would be nice
>> to have. I'm not sure how possible it is as the density of the nodes
>> changes from subject to subject at various locations in order to reflect
>> the anatomy. I don't know if one surface will work for this (but maybe
>> if it is higher res). Bruce might have more insight.
>>
>> doug
>>
>> Matt Glasser wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi Doug,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your response.  How does one go about getting registered
white
>>> matter surfaces then?  I would like all of the surfaces to be registered
>>>       
> so
>   
>>> that they have the same number of nodes in the same places across
>>>       
> subjects.
>   
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Matt.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Douglas N Greve [mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 12:01 PM
>>> To: m...@ma-tea.com
>>> Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Application of Default Surface Based
>>>       
> Registration
>   
>>> to Surfaces Other than the Sphere
>>>
>>> I'm not sure what you mean. When the sphere.reg is registered across
>>> subjects, it is sufficient to register the wm surfaces.
>>>
>>> doug
>>>
>>> Matt Glasser wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am wondering if there is a way to apply the default surface based
>>>> registration that is done during recon-all to surfaces other than the
>>>> sphere so that the nodes are all lined up?  I am wanting to have
>>>> registered white matter surfaces that I can map data from the volume
>>>> to the surface to and then average across subjects.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Matt.
>>>>
>>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>       
>>     
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>   



_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to